Fallon
Super Member
8mph is a bit fast for a flail. Most people go around 3 when running a flail. Flails mulch a lot more, so going slower really helps with the quality of the cut & mulching.
Hi Guys,
I'm looking at a used 84' Motrim flail mower on eBay. It looks good, knives really good, but the upper hitch is slightly bent down. I'm also looking at a ford 918H eight footer, also on eBay, but it looks like it was backed into something. The roller looks slightly bent.
The allure is that these are both around $1200, and I have to keep about 20 acres of pasture down while we are without cows. Any thoughts? I run a ford 7000 as my mowing machine, it runs a woods 84 and doesn't know it's there. I'm looking for a better finish, with mowing about every 3-4 weeks. Can I run one of these at 8 MPH, or fourth gear on my ford?
Thanks
I would not buy an abused flail unless you could actually test it first. A bent main rotor is a big problem.
Yes it was at 540pto. It's just odd on how it really didn't cut anything. I think the height is set at about 4 inches. It's one hole from the highest, which I believe is 5 inches. Take a look at these pics. The 2ft tall Johnson grass was only pushed over. I'm going to have to get all new bolts and blades. All the bolts and nuts are rusted on and for the most part stripped. It was hard to tell even what size socket to use. I'm probably going to have to grind or torch them all off. I tried for almost 30 minutes to get just one off so I knew what size and length to replace them with and after fighting the fire ants from the grass from being on my back I decided to give up. I need to go ahead and order some blades so maybe I can cut this weekend. One of the bearings had a little resistance, but it wasn't grinding or anything and I can easily turn it by hand, but i'll probably go ahead and replace both the roller and shaft bearings as time allows. I just wanted to make sure the cutting shaft wasn't warped or bent before I put a bunch of money in this thing.
On another note, what is the overload point on flail mowers, meaning I'm used to seeing a shear pin or slip clutch. I assume it's just belt slippage maybe and a burnt up belt. I know the blades will just pivot back if a rock is hit, but I guess there is no break point between the tractor and gearbox.
View attachment 437248
Am I crazy or these blades don't seem reversible. I got my new blades thinking the cutting edge would be down, but its on the back side of the open faced V. Leonz said the reverse cutting side should be better, but these new blades do not seem reversible at all, only one cutting side has an edge.. help me figure this puzzle out. The flail rotor spins the same at tractor tire...forward motion.. The open faced V side is not doing any cutting..? right?
You must have a very large and powerful tractor to run any kind of 84 foot mower at 8 mph. Is there possibly a typographical error or do they have big mowers in Indiana?Hi Guys,
I'm looking at a used 84' Motrim flail mower on eBay. It looks good, knives really good, but the upper hitch is slightly bent down. I'm also looking at a ford 918H eight footer, also on eBay, but it looks like it was backed into something. The roller looks slightly bent.
The allure is that these are both around $1200, and I have to keep about 20 acres of pasture down while we are without cows. Any thoughts? I run a ford 7000 as my mowing machine, it runs a woods 84 and doesn't know it's there. I'm looking for a better finish, with mowing about every 3-4 weeks. Can I run one of these at 8 MPH, or fourth gear on my ford?
Thanks
View attachment 437248
Am I crazy or these blades don't seem reversible. I got my new blades thinking the cutting edge would be down, but its on the back side of the open faced V. Leonz said the reverse cutting side should be better, but these new blades do not seem reversible at all, only one cutting side has an edge.. help me figure this puzzle out. The flail rotor spins the same at tractor tire...forward motion.. The open faced V side is not doing any cutting..? right?

The rotor does appear to turn in reverse rotation, which does make sense as this would give it the ability to recut clippings.
Forward spinning rotor wouldn't cut very efficiently. I thought the blades were mounted backwards, but it does not seem to be the case as the edge of these has formed on the open v side. I hope new blades will make this thing cut, especially after 5-10 hours of welding and metal prep for paint. There is no reason it shouldn't cut well, I'm just surprised the old blades didn't cut at all.
Am I crazy or these blades don't seem reversible. I got my new blades thinking the cutting edge would be down, but its on the back side of the open faced V. Leonz said the reverse cutting side should be better, but these new blades do not seem reversible at all, only one cutting side has an edge.. help me figure this puzzle out. The flail rotor spins the same at tractor tire...forward motion.. The open faced V side is not doing any cutting..? right?
I think the reason it didn't cut well is because they are on backwards.The rotor does appear to turn in reverse rotation, which does make sense as this would give it the ability to recut clippings. Forward spinning rotor wouldn't cut very efficiently. I thought the blades were mounted backwards, but it does not seem to be the case as the edge of these has formed on the open v side. I hope new blades will make this thing cut, especially after 5-10 hours of welding and metal prep for paint. There is no reason it shouldn't cut well, I'm just surprised the old blades didn't cut at all.
I cannot tell from the photo of the mower whether those are single piece one sided "scoop" blades or simply a pair of worn Y shaped blades. I've never seen a one sided Y blade pair but all scoop knives are one sided.
You mean someone put something on backwards?? That's the first time in the history of TBN a part was mounted bassackwards (not).I think the reason it didn't cut well is because they are on backwards.:thumbdown:
![]()
I think the reason it didn't cut well is because they are on backwards.:thumbdown:
![]()
I think the reason it didn't cut well is because they are on backwards.:thumbdown: