L39s are arriving!

/ L39s are arriving! #1  

JimMorrissey

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2001
Messages
1,804
Location
Southern Maine (now)
Tractor
'05/'06 L39 TLB
Sold ones that is......

I'm waiting to take delivery due to a lack of rear work lights, front hydraulic system, tool box, and the 24" bucket. Those are being shipped seperately for some reason. I'm also hoping the rates will come down in the next couple of weeks before I sign the binding financial papers /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif

Here's a front view picture I grabbed of mine the other day. I'll post some more.
 

Attachments

  • 602680-L39_Front.JPG
    602680-L39_Front.JPG
    96.6 KB · Views: 666
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#2  
Here's another shot of the hoe. It's a pretty amazing piece of work on such a small machine. I was impressed with the size of the stabilizer cylinders and the height I could get.

One other small thing I noticed was that the step to get up onto the machine was big and wide...easy to get on and off with muddy boots. I twisted my ankel last fall on my L3830 when stepping off onto the little U shaped support they decied to use. I limped for two months...not fun.
 

Attachments

  • 602682-L39_hoe.JPG
    602682-L39_hoe.JPG
    93.8 KB · Views: 539
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#3  
Here's another side view of the machine and hoe. That's an 18" bucket.....the standard.
 

Attachments

  • 602683-L39_SideHoe.JPG
    602683-L39_SideHoe.JPG
    95.8 KB · Views: 489
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#4  
Here's one of her fine front/side attributes....
 

Attachments

  • 602688-L39_Side.jpg
    602688-L39_Side.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 427
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#5  
Here's a good pic of the hoe bucket quick-attach system. You pull one pin and grab a new bucket.
 

Attachments

  • 602691-hoe_quickattach.JPG
    602691-hoe_quickattach.JPG
    91.8 KB · Views: 421
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Here's one (posted earlier) that shows a comparison between the L48 and the L39. Quite a size difference. I think the size is mainly in the tires. However, the L39 hoe is only 100 lbs or more weaker than the L48, but it's much more manuverable and the loader is built right into the frame...very strong. As Sky said, the engineering and the fit and finish are flawless, from what I could see. The paint is automotive quality. It's about as rugged a machine for it size that I've ever seen.

-Seems to be a perfect little unit for my needs....Time will tell.
 

Attachments

  • 602694-L39_L48.JPG
    602694-L39_L48.JPG
    95.9 KB · Views: 498
/ L39s are arriving! #7  
Nice pics Jim, and a nice tractor. But I have to ask are you in love?
 
/ L39s are arriving! #8  
Jim, Thanks for the update! /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif Your comment about the relative size of the L39 to the JD 110 was most interesting. I would have thought that the size would have been close to the JD110. It is hard to believe that they matched thr JD specs so closely and still be smaller than the 110.

When are you going to take delivery?

Jon
 
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#9  
Not sure at this point....It could be a couple of weeks before the front hydraulics get shipped and installed. The 24" bucket might turn out to be a problem too. I told him to order a 24", but he got an 18".

It's not that much smaller than a 110, but it is definitely smaller. It looks like a great size for trailering and such. If you saw some of the pics posted you can see that the L48 towers over it. The great thing is that the hoe specs are very similar without all the size and weight. Not that size and weight are bad, but for my purposes, smaller physical size and less weight are preffered in the long run.

I'm not real sure about the GST though. It seemed like I had to do a lot of work to get it to go forward and back while using the loader....clutch here...throw this lever, grab this lever, hit the gas...Likely I don't know what I'm doing yet.

Here's something interesting: I found that when I climbed up a snow bank to dump a load over the back side, I had to push in the clutch to stop it from climbing over the top. I then had to quickly hit the brakes to keep it from rolling back down the slope before I could dump the bucket......well, some safety feature kicked in and shut the machine down while the front end is 8' off the ground /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif I though it was strange or a slight mechanical error, so I tried it again...Same thing, the engine died. GST is going to take some getting used to.

Hopefully Sky will have some input tonight after nearly a week of using his. I bet he has 20-25 hours on it already.
 
/ L39s are arriving! #10  
The only thing, though, is that Skypup's L3130 is a GST, if I'm not mistaken. So in terms of transitioning from HST to GST, he's not going to be much help. But I'm sure he'll be able to give you input on technique. I'm just glad my B3030 has HST.
 
/ L39s are arriving!
  • Thread Starter
#11  
Yeah, HST would be nice. However, the loader and any hydraulic quick-attach implements get full hydraulic flow with GST. I'd guess there are some other good engineering reasons why they went GST on this machine. I'm just going to have to get used to it.

About 10-12 years ago I used to regularly use a geared JD 770 (fathers). Being that I didn't know anything different, it never crossed my mind that changing gears manually was an issue. Now, after having two HST driven machines...I'm spoiled. I'll have to get the "leather" back in my palms. -I'm hoping I'll come to prefer the GST. /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
/ L39s are arriving! #12  
Jim, I don't think it's so much that you need to hope you will prefer GST over HST, you will simply accomodate it and it will work very nice especially on a machine that heavy, with that much power requirement in terms of hydraulic flow and all the added weight/traction you will have on the rear. Personally, I don't think the L39 would have performed very well as a HST especially since it has the same engine I have on my L3830. The L48 has one problem that I simply could not get used to, either not enough power or to few ranges. Medium was to slow and high was to high. Sure in medium or low you had enough power, it was the time it took to do things. I suppose the best of both worlds would be either more hydro ranges or a electric downshift like NH has or simply more diesel to make up the difference. There is no question in my mind that the right hydro, on the right size tractor with adequate HP is significantly faster at loader, manuvering, and tight quarters control, but the L39 would not be a candidate for it. I think the L48 with a considerably more powerful engine is a good example. Even it would have probably benefitted from GST. On the otherhand, my L3830 is a sterling example of how to best set up HST. It is simply fantastic. Enjoy your L39
 
/ L39s are arriving! #13  
Jim, I absolutely love the GST on the L39, it is even slicker than the GST on my L3130. You'll get used to it fast, just remember it is basically an automated manual transmission, just use the shuttle shift allot for Forward-Neutral-Reverse. I just use the F-N-R lever, hardly ever the clutch. It sure beats the living daylights out of an HST! /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif

I've got 35 hours on ours now and I'll post some pics of me removing a stump as large as a Volkswagen Beetle with the BT1000 backhoe, it is extremely powerful and versatile. The pics are amazing.... /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

Attached is a comparison of our L-3130 with the L39, the straight FEL boom on the L39 took the most getting used to. I sure does have some terriffic breakout force! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 

Attachments

  • 604264-L39 3130 Side3.jpg
    604264-L39 3130 Side3.jpg
    73.7 KB · Views: 250
/ L39s are arriving! #14  
"It sure beats the living daylights out of an HST!"


Uh oh, I knew the reports about the L39 were to good to be true. Knowing that this is not possible. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
 
/ L39s are arriving! #15  
Rat, I've had a MF HST hydrostatic transmission for over twenty years now and the new Kubota GST 12F-8R tranny is much better for me. I like the precise control of the throttle and gear selection for the project at hand. HST give great control too, but not as good as the GST for me. In particular I DO like adjusting the GST foot throttle to the load instead of operating at a constant throttle on the HST. I also prefer selecting the proper gear (12 forward and 8 reverse it is difficult NOT to have a good gear for the job).

Also, the fuel economy is enhanced too, I put 16.5 hours of operation on less than 1/2 tank of the L39 this past weekend (of course I am still breaking it in so have been operating the BH at ~1,300 rpm). But it is giving me outstanding fuel economy, as does the 3130 GST too.

To each his own, but I much prefer the manual transmission with the associated ease of the GST.
 
/ L39s are arriving! #16  
Hydro tranny is completely separate from the implement pump, separate from the steering pump too for that matter.

</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Yeah, HST would be nice. However, the loader and any hydraulic quick-attach implements get full hydraulic flow with GST. )</font>
 
/ L39s are arriving! #17  
" I've had a MF HST hydrostatic transmission for over twenty years now"

Interesting, have you had any issues with it. I am so unfamiliar with MF and it's products. Thats a fairly old tractor with HST and you should be able to provide some insight on how well MF's HST have held over the years. Kubotas GST is very nice, I have used one and found it worked well. I typically operate my L3830 at about 2000 RPM, on this engine (same one as the L39), that is just purring along, very quiet and smooth. This engine mates very well to either GST or HST. For the weight of the L39, I think with this small engine, GST is the better choice.

I talked to the mechanic at my local JD/Kubota dealer and he said the new GST's are holding up very well inspite of all the electric solenoids. I asked which transmission he preferred, GST or HST and he proceeded to tell me that he hated HST with a passion. Said he would never own one and cursed them. I asked why, were you experiencing mechanical issues with them? He said the Kubotas HST were bullet proof short of running it out of oil but he just always had gears. (sounds like a familar tune around TBN). So, again I ask or say, then GST is what you would go with and he looked at me, head tilted and said, I'm a full fledged convert. I would only go HST with Kubota given the choice. That certainly made me feel a little better about the longevity of HST since all this guy does is the major repair work for the dealer. You are correct though, it is personal choice and I find that just having a shuttle shift so much nice then the old mechanical shift. Add GST to that mix and you really have a nice setup. I really like the design of the new L39, even it's lower profile is great. When I had the L48, I never could get accustom to the HST and very low gearing for both Low and Medium range. My L3830 HST adequately addresses that.
 
/ L39s are arriving! #19  
I've had virtually zero problems with the Hydrostatic transmission on our 1985 MF 1030 except for the price of the hydraulic filters!

I was thinking of selling it but it works 100% perfect so I'm keeping it. It's been simple to maintain, just changing out the hydraulic fluid and the filters and sometime adjusting the engagement adjustement mechanisms to insure full disingagement and no creep.

What I don't like is operating at a constant rpm when you don't need to, it wastes fuel.
 
/ L39s are arriving! #20  
35K for ours.
 

Marketplace Items

UNUSED WOLVERINE 6' FORK EXTENSIONS (A64281)
UNUSED WOLVERINE...
UNUSED WOLVERINE LL-12-78W-78" LAND LEVELER (A64281)
UNUSED WOLVERINE...
UNUSED WOLVERINE (A64281)
UNUSED WOLVERINE...
2018 Cat D6T LGP VPAT Dozer (A62679)
2018 Cat D6T LGP...
E-Z TRAIL 3400 SEED TENDER (A63291)
E-Z TRAIL 3400...
2019 Volvo VNR64T T/A Sleeper Cab Truck Tractor (A61573)
2019 Volvo VNR64T...
 
Top