Stihl vs Husqvarna

   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #41  
Computers (which don't need to be put on every stupid thing) are the reason that I will not buy a new saw until the ones I have no longer function or there aren't any non-computerized used ones found.
There are new pro saws available that are not computerized....
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #43  
The 400 will beat a 562.


Now if you are really talking about a 572, and not a 562, the 572 will be very close to the 400. A 572 should be way above a 400.1. I say should be because I don't even think the 400.1 is in the US yet.

I just have not warmed up yet to the modern saws with a computer chip in them. I like my old true two stroke saws without stratified motors. I use them a lot at my cabin and there is not a shop close to put on a computer if something goes wrong.
Yes a 572 Mark II.
I think it would be close, but the 572 II is considerably less expensive, but haven’t looked at the weights yet.

On edit: All the Huskys I am seeing are $869-$999
 
Last edited:
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #44  
2 of the reasons I have shifted from Echo and Dolmar to Stihl, is my dealer gives me 10% off every Stihl I buy and lots of small freebies, but thats a heck of a price on that Husky.
I am not really brand loyal. I may go to a brand I like first, but I’m always open minded enough to buy something else.

Thanks for the tip, I was about to move on a 400.
I may have mentioned this before. Dolmar/ Mitsubishi no longer makes IC saws. Only battery powered equipment.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #45  
Yes a 572 Mark II.
I think it would be close, but the 572 II is considerably less expensive, but haven’t looked at the weights yet.

On edit: All the Huskys I am seeing are $869-$999
Buckin' Billy Ray on Youtube has a mark II 562 and 572. They are worked up saws but I think he has a video where he compares the 572 to a 500i. I think the 572 compared well.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #46  
Yes a 572 Mark II.
I think it would be close, but the 572 II is considerably less expensive, but haven’t looked at the weights yet.

On edit: All the Huskys I am seeing are $869-$999
I had no idea Husky is labeling the current 572 as a Mark II. I didn't realize they had to put out an updated 572. I guess I'm curious why the original 572 needed a mid release update.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #47  
I just have not warmed up yet to the modern saws with a computer chip in them. I like my old true two stroke saws without stratified motors. I use them a lot at my cabin and there is not a shop close to put on a computer if something goes wrong.
lol... all of my Stihl's still have an 0 in the first digit of the model number. :ROFLMAO:

I've not run the MS-362, but I have countless hundreds of hours on its predecessor, the 036 PRO. Great little saw, perfect as the the "medium" position in a 3-saw kit.

I've owned many Stihls, and a few Husqvarnas. Another guy I used to cut with owned a lot of Husqvarnas, and a few Stihls. All pro saws, both brands. If I had to characterize the overall "brand ethos" of each, it seems Husqvarna is always trying to lead on power/weight ratio, maybe at the expense of some durability. Stihl is always close behind on power/weight, sometimes even equal, but often with better durability.

One local guy I'm friendly with, who owns a tree service with several crews burning through several saws per year, prefers Husqvarna for himself but Stihl for his crews. He said his beloved Husqvarnas are just too delicate in the hands of his crews, who were perpetually breaking them. Interesting perspective.

Personally, I prefer pre-Mtronic Stihl, maybe just because it's what I know. But wouldn't ever turn down any Husqvarna pro saw, either. I don't subscribe to any strict brand loyalty.

It sounds like a few guys here, like Snobdds, know model-by-model. Probably best to take their advice.
 
Last edited:
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #48  
What's a "crank stuffer"?
Goes around crank sort of like a full circle used to be.

Crank I had for 5000 at one time. You get the idea.

357xp used them back in the day too. 359 didnt.

Pic of 562 gen1 that used them.

They actually wear out and can come loose.



p5000mvpfc.jpg
h562cs.jpg
h562css.jpg
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #49  
One of the things I have often found a bit interesting is guys who say they would never buy a computer controlled saw but then buy a computer controlled tractor.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #50  
I havent even heard of a MKII 572. If there is should be on decal on recoil like the rest. ?

Dont see any 572 listed as mkII? 572 XP® Gas Chainsaw

PHO weight of 572.

572 has a updated pulley now for those weak 2 prong ones that came out in beginning.

h572weightsmalldawgstockcc.jpg
h572pulley.jpg
h572pulleyy.jpg
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #51  
Went to Husky after Stihl when the single pin bar fastener bolt pulled out of the plastic case and Stihl would not cover it under warranty. Husky is harder to start but has been a good replacement. Still have a Stihl 029-Super ranch saw that has maybe 20 minutes on it. It's also hard to start but cuts VERY well.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #52  
One of the things I have often found a bit interesting is guys who say they would never buy a computer controlled saw but then buy a computer controlled tractor.

This theory relies upon computer controlled tractors as a gold standard of reliability...because computer controlled saw sure aren't. There is a reason the forest service forbids computer controlled saws on fires.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #53  
I havent even heard of a MKII 572. If there is should be on decal on recoil like the rest. ?

Dont see any 572 listed as mkII? 572 XP® Gas Chainsaw

PHO weight of 572.

572 has a updated pulley now for those weak 2 prong ones that came out in beginning.

View attachment 2063436View attachment 2063437View attachment 2063438
This website is calling it the 572 mark II.

But I don't think it really is, just bad verbiage.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #54  
This website is calling it the 572 mark II.

But I don't think it really is, just bad verbiage.
Interesting my dealer local dont call them MKII

Never heard anyone in the know call them MKII.

h572p.jpg
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #55  
I know who to ask in my group. Couple big dealers there. ;)
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #56  
This theory relies upon computer controlled tractors as a gold standard of reliability...because computer controlled saw sure aren't. There is a reason the forest service forbids computer controlled saws on fires.

I can assure you that many tractor repair shops would disagree with you that computer controlled tractors are the gold standard. In fact, many of these modern emission computer controlled tractors have had their fair share of problems. It is also still to be determined if these tractors will even be operating 30-40 years down the road like many of the older mechanical tractors are today.

And I have and still own several professional computer controlled saws that have always functioned perfectly fine and start much easier as well.

Just because some bureaucrat in a big office with no real world experience with chainsaws made a rule restricting their use, means nothing to me.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #57  
There are new pro saws available that are not computerized....
261 462 661 881 in stihl and 585 395 3120 in husky for US

Used to be a 362 carb version too not sure if that one still a option.

592 with AT and 585 with regular carb

h59222222.jpg
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #58  
One of the things I have often found a bit interesting is guys who say they would never buy a computer controlled saw but then buy a computer controlled tractor.
I didn't. My first tractor that I bought back in Oct of this year is a 1990 Ford 1520. Besides it not being computerized (that I am aware of), I am also the second owner.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #59  
I can assure you that many tractor repair shops would disagree with you that computer controlled tractors are the gold standard. In fact, many of these modern emission computer controlled tractors have had their fair share of problems. It is also still to be determined if these tractors will even be operating 30-40 years down the road like many of the older mechanical tractors are today.

And I have and still own several professional computer controlled saws that have always functioned perfectly fine and start much easier as well.

Just because some bureaucrat in a big office with no real world experience with chainsaws made a rule restricting their use, means nothing to me.

I'm not following your argument. You correlated new saws to new tractors with a purchasing reluctance. Then you bagged on new tractors with emissions and computers.

Then you came back and praised new saws for them being reliable for you, despite you saying computers decrease life span. 🤪

I think the context of the conversation was, despiste new saw being initially good, will they still be usable in 50 years? Will there even be parts around for these saws then?

I have bought up so many pre emission saws that are just simple to use. Combine that with can gas, that is not really gas but naptha, they should last another 50 years with very minimal upkeep. Maybe a new carb kit every 25 years.
 
   / Stihl vs Husqvarna #60  
261 462 661 881 in stihl and 585 395 3120 in husky for US

Used to be a 362 carb version too not sure if that one still a option.

592 with AT and 585 with regular carb

View attachment 2063443
365 and 372XP are still non-computerized as well, unless something changed real recently
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2008 Dynapac CA150D (A60462)
2008 Dynapac...
Massey Ferguson 9250 (A56438)
Massey Ferguson...
2016 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A59231)
2016 Ford Explorer...
(INOP) 2016 CATERPILLAR 259D SKID STEER (A60429)
(INOP) 2016...
Towable Chemical Applicator Sprayer (A59228)
Towable Chemical...
500 BBL FRAC TANK (A58214)
500 BBL FRAC TANK...
 
Top