HayFarmer
Silver Member
Usually, but had to resort to the .22 twice.Usually a Daisy BB gun is enough to deter wandering dogs on my property.
Usually, but had to resort to the .22 twice.Usually a Daisy BB gun is enough to deter wandering dogs on my property.
I've got various cousins that focus on different types of Ag. The pig farmer's place was always the worst smell.I like the idea of the OP raising pigs as close to their side of the property line as possible. Maybe the next 10 years straight of that will give the neighbors a "fresh" perspective.
I raised two every summer for about 6 years. They were always up in my back field, but there were days when they were pretty rank. Then there was the time I brought a bucket of the previous year’s manure and dumped it on the flower garden next to my driveway… talk about stink! I wasn’t long dumping some lime on it!I've got various cousins that focus on different types of Ag. The pig farmer's place was always the worst smell.
The only way I would use lethal means to deter an animal is if I felt unsafe. I hope I don't have to go down that road.Usually, but had to resort to the .22 twice.
The question would be if that applies because the Right to farm act specifically discusses commercial farming in the definition of a farm, I'm not sure if that's supposed to be referencing the "other appurtenances" needed for a farm, or if it's supposed to limit it to commercial farms only (if it is supposed to limit it, that's probably what the judge is referencing, that would be something worth bringing up with the State Department of agriculture so they can provide their opinion because the one that you linked would seem to indicate that commercial farming is not required to be protected under the Right To Farm law)This is in Michigan, correct? This link explains about Michigan law regarding this and there's really no way the plaintiff(s) could prevail.View attachment 814842
MIce, groundhogs and coons need to be controlled around here. No armadillos around here, I guess no mice in TX.The only way I would use lethal means to deter an animal is if I felt unsafe. I hope I don't have to go down that road.
I've had to dispose of an armadillo but that's about it so far.
I think if more people would educate themselves on their State Constitution a lot of this nonsense would be defeated. Ask yourself a question, were individual State Constitutions/ United States Constitution written for the people to understand and be protected or the Attorneys and Justices to understand and benefit/ make money from? At the expense of the people? Show me in any constitution where it says the people have to pay for their rights? Who gives the people their rights? Education is key and the only thing public schools have done is train the people to be subservient, and the BAR exists to ensure a paycheck for their members. It’s a private association, and we aren’t in it, and it doesn’t benefit the people.
What is written that is being infringed upon?So how does the guy with the nose/smell issue not fit into this? He feels his rights are being infringed upon too.
The complainers property rights. Specifically I am thinking environmental degradation.What is written that is being infringed upon?
JM quotes gives one context into what is written in States and the Republics Constitution.There are lots of questions here, specifically did the complainer sign off regarding farming next door, as previously posted, and what is to be considered reasonable smell? Or is something else at play here? Would the possibility of the farm being sold to a developer or large trucking company because the op is tired of this change their mind? For the record James Madison quotes aren’t written law.
Be real unfortunate if courts decide that farmers can’t have manure on their property.In my mind it doesn‘t matter if the person who is started the law suit signed off on anything or not. It matters if the person has the right to have a pike of horse manure or not.