Molalla1
Super Member
Do we have any old farts in this thread?
'Ok Boomer!'
:laughing: Maybe a few of us.
Do we have any old farts in this thread?
'Ok Boomer!'
You may want to check your assertion.
Flu ~ 1 in 1000
Coronavirus ~ 1 in 29
Thats a factor of 34 X. Hardly slightly
1st case in America ? state of California
"At this time, the patient exposure is unknown,'' the CDC said in a statement. "It is possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States.
Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It is also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.''
I don't know about you guys but I have the maturity level of a 16 year old.....
:laughing: My mind says that but my body says NO.
:laughing: Maybe a few of us.
I don't know about you guys but I have the maturity level of a 16 year old.....
IMO anyone that has traveled back into the US from any of the infected countries and has not reported it should be criminally charged and given mandatory jail time...!(if they survive the virus)...something like one month for every person they MAY have exposed to the virus.
No jets in 1918 but there was even worse exposure in slow troop ships. Article: Infectious Diseases In World War 1. It says "About a quarter of the US population fell ill. Perhaps one-third of the world population were stricken. Recent studies now estimate 50 million flu deaths worldwide with a possible upper limit of 100 million".The Flu pandemic of 1918/19 happened in three phases. The first phase was somewhat mild, the second phase is the one that killed 40+ million people, and the last phase was somewhat mild. Its estimated that 1/3 of the world's population at that time got infected: And this was before the age of the jet and casual tourism.
Found the prude! :laughing:Thats me.Are you the guy who ... doesn't "Identify as somebody of 69"?![]()
Not the first time you walked point, huh buddy?![]()
It wasnt necessary because Ebola can only be transmitted after significant fever develops and the course of the disease proceeds into the messy stage. Self monitoring for fever by a medical professional proved to be 100% effective to establish isolation conditions prior to transmissibility.Back in the Ebola scare our governor took a lot of heat because he felt that nurses returning from helping should be quarantined. In my mind, either he was right; or else the "Doctors without Borders" need to be a little more diligent about letting us know why that wasn't necessary.