Your input?

/ Your input? #41  
I purchased from one in Carnesville and one in Oakway, SC. I got prices from Piedmont, SC and Blue Ridge, GA also.
If I remember, Mason's in Blue Ridge was very competitive at that time. I notice they have a place in Cumming also.
Sometimes you can get ideas from the sale prices at Kubota Tractors of North Carolina - Carver Equipment in Dunn: we stock and sell new and used Kubota tractors, kubota parts, used kubota tractors, rtv, diesel, for sale, mower, dealers, engine, backhoe, loader, bx, accessories, bx24, 900, generator, r
 
/ Your input? #42  
I'm pretty sure I saw a Case IH dealer in Dallas the last time I went through there, as close as you are it's worth the trip to check them too.
 
/ Your input? #43  
The loader problem on Kiotis has long been fixed. It is a new design that does not require any sort of bolt on "monstrosity". New loader is a real work horse. To tell the difference, the new one uses a round tube for the cross member vs. more of a rectangle on the old one. There is a bolt-on "fix" for the old one, but I would stay away from it entirely. Not likely that there are any left on new tractors. But, that CK25 you mentioned might have the old one. Ask the dealer about it. There is nothing to worry about with the new style loader. I've moved over 500 tons of dirt and rip-rap with mine. Works great!
 
/ Your input? #44  
ANY tractor you buy should have extendable rear links on the 3ph to help hook up equipement. Otherwise, you will need to muscle things around sometimes to get them hooked up. It is the single biggest problem my wife has with the tractor. Sometimes I have to be there to hook up the equipment.

While you're at it do yourself a favor and get Pat's Easy change system. They advertise on this site. I had a quick hitch and it was a lot better than NOT having one but Pat's Easy Change hitch is even better. The extendable links would be a plus but even without it I don't have to muscle implements around any more. I can just back up, lift the 3 pt and the bottom links are done. Then you just connect the top link which is easy.

BTW - you're right near my sister - she's in Canton too - nice country!
 
/ Your input? #45  
Agree with Gerard here. I cannot see needing extendable lower link pins since I have a a Pat's. You can't make it much easier than adding a Pat's.
 
/ Your input? #46  
I have telescopic lower links. I've thought about a Pat's or other quick change set up. But, the telescopic works so well that I really can't justify the expense. Now, I'm about to buy a very heavy box blade. This may change my mind,:rolleyes:
 
/ Your input? #47  
My neighbor with 5 acres has a 30 hp JD, a 4310. I've 8.5 acres and have an 18.5 hp JD, a 4010. For what you need to do, a 25-30 hp tractor ought to do it. If you also want to mow with it, you might stick with no bigger than a 25 hp, about like a JD 2520. I question why anyone would want to mow more than about 0.5 acre anyway. One can do 0.5 acre with a little walk behind. Just bush hog the rest every couple of years to get rid of unwanted saplings and the like. You might have to bush hog it a couple times a year the first year or so to knock down unwanted weeds. How big a tractor you want to do this depends on how much time you want to take. A smaller machine just takes a bit longer.

Consider also the cost of fuel. It'll likely go back up to those $4-5/gallon prices before you can say how much it costs. A smaller machine will use less fuel.

Ralph
 
/ Your input?
  • Thread Starter
#48  
Thanks for the responses again. So much to learn and evaluate!

So today we went by a Kioti and Massey Ferguson dealership to check out their models. We learned a lot, but i'm not sure we got any closer to a decision! :eek:

At Kioti, we test drove the CK series first. They are certainly nicer than the Mahindra 2816, with telescoping link ends for example, and a few other nice features. But we didn't like the shuttle shifter much; too clunky for our tastes, we both had to man-handle it. We tried the HST, and it works fine, but the wife is still not a big fan of 'm :p All in all the CKs were ok and they certainly seem solid tractors, but we weren't blown away by them. When we talked numbers, the financing deals they have on 'm are ok but not great: a free loader & 10.4% or no free loader & 3.25%/60mos / 3.75%/72mos, all choices increasing the total cost over the term of the loan obviously. When we compare the price and what we'd get to the Mahindra 2816 or the Massey Fergusson 1533 (see below), the CKs don't stand out. (This is true for our situation where we're financing, it may be different for other people.)

As we were talking numbers with the Kioti sales guy (nice fellow), we noticed that they have a nice financing offer of 0%/72mos on the DK45S. The guy smiled and said we'd like that machine. He had one on the lot (from before the price increase :)) So we hopped on and played with it, and yup, we liked it :) That's a tractor! :D With the financing they have on it, it's actually a better deal financially than the CK35, and the CK27 HST is close enough that for just a hair more money (we're talking peanuts here in the grand scheme of things) we'd be able to get the DK45S instead. So for about the same money we'd spend on the CK27 or CK35 (HST), we could get a DK45S (shuttle) which is a whole 'nother level of tractor. Besides much more power and obviously bigger / heavier frame, it has some nice extra features like rear hydraulics, a remote 3PH lever, and push button PTO & 4WD for example. So that seems like a no-brainer almost... But that's a much bigger tractor! We're wondering if that'd be overkill for our situation, if there is such a thing. What do you think?

Based on a PM from a member here informing me of Massey Ferguson's 0% financing deal, i called the local MF dealer earlier this week to get some info. Based on our situation and my size (6'6+), the salesguy there recommended i check out the 1533, since it's on the bigger frame than the 1531 and below models. He worked some numbers for me to try to be competitive with the Mahindra 2816, and came back with what seems to be a very competitive offer. So we had to go check out the tractor in person. They weren't open today, but he was nice enough to get one parked out for us to sit on etc. From the specs it is obviously better than the Mahindra 2816. And with the 0% financing deal they have, it sure is a tempting alternative. We also sat on the smaller versions, which are definitely a smaller frame, comparable to the Kioti CKs and Mahindra 2816. We also sat on the bigger 1540 and 1547 models (to compare to the DK45S), but apart from engine size and one or two nice to have features they were identical to the 1533 it seemed (which is what the sales guy had told me as well). The gear selection etc on these tractors feels better, with a more positive "click" feedback than the Kiotis. On that front the MFs won out over all the others i think. The MFs also have power shuttle as an option instead of just plain synchro shuttle, which is nice.

So now instead of having narrowed down our options, we have a dilemma :( The Mahindra 2816 is the cheapest out of the bunch, and it would probably be sufficiently powerful / big enough for what we want and need. It is nothing special, just a plain vanilla tractor with a loader that would do the job. But now that i've sat on these others, i'm not a big fan of the ergonomics (platform space, control layout, mainly the bucket hydraulics position), and its specs are obviously on the low end of all the options we've looked at. The Massey 1533 is a little more expensive, but still in our financial comfort zone, and it's a good bit more tractor than the Mahindra (on paper at least). I like the ergonomics / controls on the MFs a lot better than on the Mahindra. And then the Kioti DK45S is financially right where we had originally set our comfort zone's upper limit, so it'd be following the "get the biggest tractor you can afford" mantra. We like its controls and ergonomics (although the MF is better in that regard i think.) It is a BIG tractor though :eek: The lift capacity and weight and all that on this puppy are way higher. As we were walking the lot looking at attachments / implements, it was a nice feeling to think that if we'd go with the DK45S, we wouldn't have to worry about the size of the implements, because it would handle them. Peace of mind in that regard is nice. If i compare the total cost of the MF 1533 vs the DK45S over the term of the loan, is DK45S is only slightly more expensive, but it seems like a lot more tractor. The MF 1540 and 1547 would be better comparisons to the DK45S specs-wise, but their price would be higher than the DK45S.

So, which one to pick? We're torn, and we'll be hashing over this some more over the next few days i'm sure. Do you guys have any input on these choices / brands / models? When is big too big? Would the 40-45 HP models, which are on a bigger frame, become too cumbersome you think? Is there such a thing as too heavy? Is there a practicality to consider here when it comes to size & weight, or is bigger almost always better? How does MF compare to Kioti in general, quality-wise for example? People here seem to really like their Kiotis, although there seem to have been some issues with quality & service for some? The Kioti dealer is the furthest away from us, and would charge us $2/loaded mile to transport the tractor for us for service etc, which would add up to probably $200-$250 per round trip or so. We don't mind changing oil etc ourselves, but if there are repairs that need to be done, we'd have to take it in to the dealer. On the flip side, Kioti has the longest and what appears to be best warranty out of them all. The MF dealer is slightly closer by than the Kioti one. I imagine they'd also charge a fee to transport the tractor for service. The Mahindra dealer is closest, and would transport the tractor for free for service.

You have proven to provide insightful feedback, so if you have some more based on all this, please feel free to share again :)
 
/ Your input? #49  
This is good that you are getting educated on these tractors. Now you need to decide on tractor size. You started out looking at tractors that have 60" buckets. Now you have moved up to tractors that have 66" and 72" buckets. These bigger tractors are just that, bigger, if the size is not a problem then I say go for the biggest that you can afford and will be comfortable with.
Oh, I think that you may have your sizing messed up. The Massey 1533 & 1540 are the same size and the 1547 is a bit bigger and would match up better against the Kioti DK45S that you have looked at. Be sure to look at all the transmission options that Massey has, there has to be one there that your wife likes.
Just think of how much fun your having looking and learning about all this stuff.

Good luck with your search.;)
 
/ Your input? #50  
I have telescopic lower links. I've thought about a Pat's or other quick change set up. But, the telescopic works so well that I really can't justify the expense. Now, I'm about to buy a very heavy box blade. This may change my mind,:rolleyes:
I have experience with a "very heavy implement" on Pat's. Altho within the stated capabilities of the standard tractor setup the implement broke the internal rocker arm on the rocker shaft after about a month of use on the tractor. Dont underestimate the extra leverage caused by extending the lift arms 4" as Pat's and all quick hitches do. The convenience stresses the tractor. Light implements OK. Heavy to near the limit -watch out
larry
 
/ Your input? #51  
Valorum - can't speak to kioti vs mahindra etc since I've never had any of them BUT as far as size the 45 hp is not too big for what you have in mind. You'll just get more work done faster but keep in mind that the implements are going to be bigger too. You'll probably need a 6 or 7 foot bushog to cover the wheels and the same applies to the other implements you get. Backblades and such you're going to need med to heavy duty 'cause you'll bend anything light duty with 45 hp. My vote is for the 45 hp. I don't know many people here who regreted getting more power. I wouldn't mind something bigger myself but I drag a small indoor arena and wouldn't want to lose the maneuverability of a smaller tractor. If that wasn't an issue I'd have a bigger one myself! (The other upside to the 45 is that loader will be able to handle large round hay bales if you use those. At 1000 lbs a 25 hp can't lift them).
 
/ Your input?
  • Thread Starter
#52  
Oh, I think that you may have your sizing messed up. The Massey 1533 & 1540 are the same size and the 1547 is a bit bigger and would match up better against the Kioti DK45S that you have looked at.
Thanks for the heads-up. I wasn't sure. I expect that the price of the 1547 (haven't gotten a quote, but i can make an educated estimate) makes it difficult for it to be competitive with the DK45S for our financial requirements. But it'll be interesting to compare. The Masseys certainly have some nicer features, but i think for our budget we'd have to give up some power compared to what we'd be able to get with Kioti.

Be sure to look at all the transmission options that Massey has, there has to be one there that your wife likes.
She likes shuttle shift it seems. I do too, but with just the synchro i have a hard time seeing the real advantage over just straight gear. Maybe i'm missing something? I do imagine the power shuttle that Massey offers would be a great compromise. No clutching to go from forward to reverse :)

Just think of how much fun your having looking and learning about all this stuff. Good luck with your search.;)
Yup, it's a fun adventure. And thanks :)

You'll probably need a 6 or 7 foot bushog to cover the wheels and the same applies to the other implements you get.
What's this about covering the wheels? Is that some sort of rule (hard or of thumb) that one should follow? I wasn't aware of such a thing. Do we have to get the 6'/7' mower, or could we still use a smaller one if we wanted to?

Backblades and such you're going to need med to heavy duty 'cause you'll bend anything light duty with 45 hp.
Hmmm, good point. I hadn't even thought about it potentially being necessary to get the bigger / heavier duty and thus more expensive implements. That'd be something to consider because of price of implements of course. How big a difference should we expect in price for example? If we go with a bigger tractor like the 45HP one, are we now setting ourselves up to pay twice as much for every implement we need? :(

(The other upside to the 45 is that loader will be able to handle large round hay bales if you use those. At 1000 lbs a 25 hp can't lift them).
We're not using the big round bales, but hey, it can't hurt to have the power available just in case.

One other thing i was reminded of in one of the other threads where you guys were giving advise to a newbie like me was the sad reality that when working with large animals you'll sometimes have to deal with the carcass of one. Since our horses are fairly big and weigh around 1200lbs, i want to make sure that whatever tractor we get has a loader that can safely handle a large, heavy carcass if necessary. The ratings of the lower end options we're looking at would always make me second guess whether it's safe to do so. I'd rather err on the side of too big than too small of course.
 
/ Your input? #53  
Cost of bigger vs. smaller implements: A little more if new, but not anywhere near double. Used there isn't much difference for 1' foot of size variation. If the money is right for the bigger tractor, then that is the way to go. Over the next twenty years, you won't be wishing for more tractor.

Note on the Kioti shuttle shift: When new they are really stiff. But after some use, and a good lubing it gets much smoother and easier. I like the shuttle on the CK's because it gives you 8 reverse speeds, running about 15% slower than the corresponding forward gear. Also, much shorter working distance and keeps your hands close to the steering wheel. It took me a while to get use to using both hands on and off the steering wheel between the loader, the shuttle, and the shifters. Felt like a juggler in the circus.

Don't neglect to consider hydraulic flow. There is a wide variation among manufacturers. Flow rate will directly impact performance of hydraulically driven implements.
 
/ Your input? #54  
DK40se or 45se..

I'd think I went to heaven! Look up the lifting capability of that loader! Move some DIRT! You will then have achieved enlightenment!

And that comes from a guy with a cracked ck30 loader..
And I reckon I'd still get a dk40se with a backhoe and 2 rear remotes for a bucket grapple and a thumb for the backhoe.
And a box blade, brush hog, and a rake.
Give me your 30,000.00 and I'll go shopping with you. You might as well go wild with it because after the "addiction" sets in, you'll be buying it all anyway..
 
/ Your input? #55  
What's this about covering the wheels? Is that some sort of rule (hard or of thumb) that one should follow? I wasn't aware of such a thing. Do we have to get the 6'/7' mower, or could we still use a smaller one if we wanted to?

Hmmm, good point. I hadn't even thought about it potentially being necessary to get the bigger / heavier duty and thus more expensive implements. That'd be something to consider because of price of implements of course. How big a difference should we expect in price for example? If we go with a bigger tractor like the 45HP one, are we now setting ourselves up to pay twice as much for every implement we need? :(

We're not using the big round bales, but hey, it can't hurt to have the power available just in case.

One other thing i was reminded of in one of the other threads where you guys were giving advise to a newbie like me was the sad reality that when working with large animals you'll sometimes have to deal with the carcass of one. Since our horses are fairly big and weigh around 1200lbs, i want to make sure that whatever tractor we get has a loader that can safely handle a large, heavy carcass if necessary. The ratings of the lower end options we're looking at would always make me second guess whether it's safe to do so. I'd rather err on the side of too big than too small of course.
I bushogged for many years using a 5' bushog on an AG tired tractor with 7' wheel spacing. With ags this was no problem, however when we got a tractor with turfs on a 5' spacing the cut of the same BH suffered. There are 2 things working here - grass flattening and time for springback. Smooth tread tires flatten all the grass and it doesnt come back up quick enuf for the mower to catch it. If the tires are set wider than mower width there is no penalty, and actually some benefit as the grass has a whole round of the field to rebound. Whichever width combo, Ags will give the best mow job of all [compared to Industrials or Turfs] because they dont flatten all the grass in a mat like the "smooth" tires.

As for large animals - it costs hundreds to get somebody with equipment to bury them. Another reason to have a Back Hoe attachment. Theres the ability to dig a big enuf hole and hopefully enuf machine to be able to lift and place the animal rather than shove it in in a heap. That always bothered me until I devised a way to do it with some respect.
larry
 
/ Your input? #56  
I think most of your questions have been answered. Re the "covering your wheels" it's not a rule but it makes some things a little easier to guage. When bushogging it's easier to guage if the mower width is the same width as your tires, just line up with the tires. Also it seems to be a little bit of a waster not to use the maximum size implement the tractor can handle since you can get the job done faster. Of course if only mowing 15 acres the time difference between a 5 footer and a 6 footer probably doesn't amount to all that much.

re: moving dead horses - You don't need to have loader capacity for that. a chain arond the hooves and you drag them to where they have to go. If you want to do it "with dignity" throw a tarp over them. Sorry for the more sensitive but it's just not easy to deal with a 1200 lb dead animal and I worry more about taking good care of them while alive than after they've passed.
 
/ Your input? #57  
While you're at it do yourself a favor and get Pat's Easy change system. They advertise on this site. I had a quick hitch and it was a lot better than NOT having one but Pat's Easy Change hitch is even better. The extendable links would be a plus but even without it I don't have to muscle implements around any more. I can just back up, lift the 3 pt and the bottom links are done. Then you just connect the top link which is easy.

BTW - you're right near my sister - she's in Canton too - nice country!

Do your self a bigger favor and skip the easy change system and get telescoping links on the 3pt hitch. It fits EVERYTHING.
 
/ Your input? #58  
Just a quick note about pricing. I have been searching for a comparable machine.I have only looked at the kubotas but the best price I have found for the L3400hst with a trailer, loader and it also includes the box blade and a 6 foot cutter. $21198.
http://www.tractorhouse.com/listings/detail.aspx?OHID=5404491&GUID=A4652604A7CB43A3AFA5BBD4A32326C2
 
/ Your input? #59  
We're slowly narrowing it down. We've effectively ruled out the smaller framed tractors (Mahindra 2816, CK series, etc). With Valorum being 6'6, the overall size of the operator platform and layout of the controls is a big deal - especially if I want to stand a chance of getting him to operate the tractor regularly. :) So that puts us up in the 30+hp tractors by default - which is obviously more tractor than we were originally thinking of. And if it's not clear, we're both analysts - there will always be the "see, we should have bought the other because of XYZ" scenario. We're trying to avoid regretting the choice of whatever we end up buying. The good thing is that the size of the bucket and width of the 30hp tractors is not as big of a deal for us because our property is mostly open pasture. There are a few tight areas that we'll to work around/in, but more on that in a moment.

While the DK45 is attractive on paper, there are a few practical things for me as the operator - 1) the height of the ROPS is too tall to clear going under our shedrow barn. That's a disaster waiting to happen. 2) the gear selection and shuttle shift were much too stiff for me to be comfortable working regularly. And odds are that I'll be the primary operator of whatever tractor we purchase. Where Valorum is tall, I'm not super strong, so I want controls that I can operate easily from day one. It being so stiff also doesn't give me the warm fuzzy that the build quality is where I'd want it. 3) the overall fit and finish seemed rough on the tractor. Example: taking the side panels off to get to the engine took some manhandling - they didn't snap back on very easily either. Again, doesn't give me a warm fuzzy on the build quality. 4) it's VERY heavy and big - I'm not sure how practical that will be for maintaining our small arena and round pen and manuevering around the area in front of the shedrow (where the fence line is a little close).

Then looking at the MF 1533/1540 there was a practical concern as well. I'm not a very heavy person. I had a very hard time setting the parking brake on the MF. This is probably something I'll figure out how to work over time. The overall fit and finish was much higher. I loved the positive feedback on the gear selector and the shuttle, it will fit under the shed row, and it basically trumps the DK in the areas the DK is weak for me. It's missing a few of the "luxury" options though - rear hydraulics, rear remote.

I think it's safe to say we've narrowed it down to choosing between the 1533 and the 1540 and the Regular Shuttle (8x8) vs. the Power Shuttle (12x12, no clutching required). For choosing the hp size, I'm getting some conflicting info on being able to pull a 6ft mower with a 33hp tractor - some say the width of the 33 frame is fine to pull the 6ft mower, some say that the 33 has to slow down too much in forward speed that you effectively spend the same amount of time mowing with a 5ft.

I think in the end, we're going to have to figure out a way to meet the dealer and drive the two transmissions to see which is the better fit for our needs. Then it will be the great HP debate, tempered with the budget we had set ourselves.
 
/ Your input? #60  
Seems that you are on the right track... How high and thick is the brush that you are going to be cutting? If it's just grass, how tall will it be? You should be fine with a 6 footer, if you are not cutting big thick stuff. Also, if it's just grass, you can sharpen the blades to a finer cutting edge. Normally, shredders are blunt for cutting woody material.

Be sure to have the dealer hook up an implement or two so you can engage them and move the tractor around with them on.
 

Marketplace Items

2021 Ford F-150 XL (A53317)
2021 Ford F-150 XL...
2018 Nissan Sentra Sedan (A59231)
2018 Nissan Sentra...
12 X 20 CAR PORT (A58214)
12 X 20 CAR PORT...
1449 (A57192)
1449 (A57192)
flatbed trailer 24ft (A56857)
flatbed trailer...
2014 Toyota Tundra Single Cab Pickup Truck (A60352)
2014 Toyota Tundra...
 
Top