Rear weighting device

[careyo63]

63 Ford no power steering. Lost most of the use or my R. arm. So far I have been able to work around that problem. I use a old International BH. and it's super heavy. major difference back there lifted. So far I've been able to use it without PS.. My area it doesn't show up Factory used. A complete tractor or want as much for the PS. as a whole used tractor. I do have a rear scoop. I like the idea of loading it with weight. I'm thinking a old Big block motor should fit nicely. 455 Gm. 460 F. etc... should fit right on it!! box it in also just for the looks also. I do have Antifreeze in the rear tires.

Attachments

• 
  1963 Ford.jpg

  1.6 MB · Views: 690

Attachments

• 
  1691859875013.jpeg

  2 MB · Views: 216

 

[S854]

Most rear weights posted here are centered… between the lift arms. Which, to me, is kinda like a tricycle arrangement.

Would there be a difference if the additional weight was divided in half and placed directly behind the rear wheels (mounted on each end of a box blade, for example).

The center weight styles are convenient from a manufacturing point of view and are more compact for tight quarters.

Like most things in life, I’m probably overthinking this…

 

[TerryR]

As long as there is equal weight on both sides, it doesn't matter. As far as the tractor is concerned, the weight is on the ends of the lower 3-point arms, no matter whether it's actually centered or spread out behind them.

 

[nch583]

On the smallest rear-wheel drive tractor, I have a curb weight of about 110 kilograms.Without it, the tractor skids when clearing snow .