Way, way, WAY too much trouble. Sell or trade it and get the one you wantI have a B2630, 2010 model. Would it be feasible to put a turbo on it for a little extra power. Some times I find the need for more power. I only own 15 acres so a bigger tractor is not really necessary.
I have a B2630, 2010 model. Would it be feasible to put a turbo on it for a little extra power. Some times I find the need for more power. I only own 15 acres so a bigger tractor is not really necessary.
I would confirm that the pistons have steel inserts to hold the upper ring set. Much boost on non steel insert pistons can pound the ring lands out of shape leading to a major loss of compression.I have a B2630, 2010 model. Would it be feasible to put a turbo on it for a little extra power. Some times I find the need for more power. I only own 15 acres so a bigger tractor is not really necessary.
Very germane and I'm not a fan of Messicks anyway. I will say that owning pre 4 equipment is a big plus for me at least. My tractors are actually appreciating in value. When a dealer offers me 30 grand for a 6000 hour machine that is a 2002, I know I'm on the right track. Especially when the machine was only 45 new in 2002.I have a Kubota B2630. Sometimes I find the need for more power. Would it be feasible to put a turbo on it for a little extra power?
I own 15 acres so a bigger tractor is not really necessary.
Have you considered that you may need more tractor WEIGHT rather than more horsepower?
Weight establishes tractor capability.
Horsepower largely determines what width PTO-POWERED-IMPLEMENTS can be powered.
Sufficient tractor weight is more important for most tractor applications than increased tractor horsepower.
Small tractor wheels drop into holes, disrupting traction. Larger wheels and tires supplied on heavier tractors bridge holes and ruts, increasing traction. Larger wheels and tires permit higher operating speed over uneven ground by reducing implement bounce and operator perturbation.
When considering a tractor upgrade bare tractor weight first, tractor horsepower second, rear axle width third, rear wheel/tire ballast fourth.
GERMANE VIDEO:
Now, this is a post that will make you think.... moving from naturally asperated to turbo.I would confirm that the pistons have steel inserts to hold the upper ring set. Much boost on non steel insert pistons can pound the ring lands out of shape leading to a major loss of compression.
Ag tires will make a big difference. I have a little 3130 that does a lot of work, albeit more slowly than a higher horsepower rig. A heavy implement on the rear helps, as does a good hand on the front loader. Nothing like a bucket of dirt for a little extra traction. I have to admit that 45 hp would let me power through where 31 hp makes me slow down, but it's a utility tractor, not a field tractor.I have a Kubota B2630. Sometimes I find the need for more power. Would it be feasible to put a turbo on it for a little extra power?
I own 15 acres so a bigger tractor is not really necessary.
Have you considered that you may need more tractor WEIGHT rather than more horsepower?
Weight establishes tractor capability.
Horsepower largely determines what width PTO-POWERED-IMPLEMENTS can be powered.
Sufficient tractor weight is more important for most tractor applications than increased tractor horsepower.
Small tractor wheels drop into holes, disrupting traction. Larger wheels and tires supplied on heavier tractors bridge holes and ruts, increasing traction. Larger wheels and tires permit higher operating speed over uneven ground by reducing implement bounce and operator perturbation.
When considering a tractor upgrade bare tractor weight first, tractor horsepower second, rear axle width third, rear wheel/tire ballast fourth.
GERMANE VIDEO:
It would take some fabrication skills to do but then you have to add fuel. Do you have the skills to get the injection system to add more fuel and at the right time.