Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion

   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #121  
MossRoad said:
A PT425 will run circles around any CUT of similar size in lawn mowing, brush hogging, material moving, snow plowing, post hole digging, etc... hands down. There simply is no other machine out there that can do the jobs that I need to do in the time that I have to do them that costs less to purchase and own than the PT425. If anyone has any actual dollar numbers to show me the light, please post them. I haven't seen one yet.
It will not run circles around a CUT brush hogging. I own and use both, and the advantage goes to the machine which is best suited for the individual job at hand. Same for post hole digging, and if you need multiple augers sizes, 3PH versions are far cheaper.

Your gas/diesel prices are wrong, Moss. You can buy untaxed diesel, which is quite a bit less than the road stuff. You can't buy untaxed gasoline, period. If you farm, you can get some of the gas tax back, but it can be a hassle.

From all the posts here, and from my experience, your maintenance costs are far below average. PT's break, and they break a lot. It costs money to repair them.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #122  
SnowRidge said:
... PT's break, and they break a lot. It costs money to repair them.


What's the deal with this? Are they Chinese:D Just kidding, but are they made that poorly? I guess that would be a major factor in some peoples decision.

I had never heard of a PT until after I got my tractor, they sound pretty handy except for that major point.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #123  
curly said:
What's the deal with this? Are they Chinese:D Just kidding, but are they made that poorly? I guess that would be a major factor in some peoples decision.

I had never heard of a PT until after I got my tractor, they sound pretty handy except for that major point.

No they are not made poorly. They are however put together in smaller numbers and with less field testing and engineering than would go into a typical CUT and therefore a bit more of the product development/improvement occurs outside the factory. I don't think that is a major issue myself as it is pretty clear to anyone buying a PT that such is the case. They don't hide it and you get to talk to the engineers and service managers directly if you do have problems. Frankly I'd rather do that than deal with a small dealer. It is probably a disadvantage compared to an experienced dealer with clout however.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #124  
IslandTractor said:
No they are not made poorly. They are however put together in smaller numbers and with less field testing and engineering than would go into a typical CUT and therefore a bit more of the product development/improvement occurs outside the factory. I don't think that is a major issue myself as it is pretty clear to anyone buying a PT that such is the case. They don't hide it and you get to talk to the engineers and service managers directly if you do have problems. Frankly I'd rather do that than deal with a small dealer. It is probably a disadvantage compared to an experienced dealer with clout however.
They are made poorly in some cases. The production line is not automated, and sometimes there are sloppy welds. Sometimes the problems are in the design, the brush cutter decks cracking, for example, and sometimes the problem is the guy behind the MIG gun. As an example of that, the weld where my finish mower's quick attach assembly was attached to the horizontal pivot bar cracked, and the assembly partially tore off. The weld showed little penetration. It was clearly a welding error.

Power Trac quality can best be described as variable.

I have never talked to an engineer. The only person you seem to be able talk to is Terry, who apparently is the tech support department. He is certainly the only one that has any answers.

If Terry is ever hit by a truck, PT owners will be in serious trouble.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #125  
Post some actual dollar figures, folks. Then I'll get off the soap box.;)
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #126  
No need for debate. We bought these machines because we wanted it. Now that you have it, you might as well like it, or get rid of it. I believe most PT's would not get rid of their PT's, except to get a larger one. Some are even satisfied with small, and that is good. I own a Kubota B9200 HST, and 5 implements, I also own a PT-1445, with a bunch of implements, and I find that I use the PT more than the Kubota. I also have a 1952 Ford 8N.

When we talk cheap, what are we talking about, cheap in price, or cheaply made, or cheap to operate.

In a pulling contest, the tractor will win every time, but in doing everyday things in quick order with little effort, the PT will outdo the tractor. So just pick one or the other, or get both and have the best of both worlds. I am satisfied with what I have, and sometimes, I think that I have to much. With that said, you can't do stuff, unless you got stuff. Why sit back and read tractor magazines, go out in the world and make your mark, with what you have.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #127  
MossRoad said:
Post some actual dollar figures, folks. Then I'll get off the soap box.;)

You have one so you know more than most of us which CUT it should be compared to...just call and get the numbers yourself.

But seriously, if it's poorly built...it should be cheaper right. And that seems to be the concensus...it's poorly built and will need a lot of maintenance and repairs.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #128  
MossRoad said:
Post some actual dollar figures, folks. Then I'll get off the soap box.;)

OK, let's use the Kioti CK20S HST as an example. That is the new 2008 model which came with a price increase that went into effect today:eek:.

Tractor with KL120B loader (comes with bucket!!!:p ) is less than a few hundred over 13000 (dealer asked that I not use their exact prices)

Matching KB2465 6.5ft backhoe with subframe takes the total up to a tad over 18000. This dealer delivers for just cost of fuel up to at least 200-300 miles or so.

A 4ft or 5ft bush hog can cost anywhere from $600 to more than double that for a premium brand. I'd imagine the PT deck is comparable to the $600 version.

5ft rear finish mower likewise costs between $1000-1800 depending on brand. Note all 3pt equipment comes with a PTO shaft included.

Adding rear hydraulic remotes is about 300 per set.
Adding a WRLong FEL diverter valve to control FEL hydraulic attachments would be about $550
Millonzi grapple about $800 plus shipping or you could just "add a grapple" to the standard bucket for about $400-600.
Rear blade for snow removal is about $300-500
PTO driven rear snow blower is more than $2K but I don't think there is a comparable implement for the PT.
Post hole digger (3pt) about $500 plus augers.
FEL "skid steer" QA adapter if you wanted to save 10-15 minutes switching out bucket and grapple would cost about $500-600.

Direct comparisons to the PT425 are difficult and the PT2425 is the closer match. Basically the KL120B loader lifts 1074lbs to full height (88"). The backhoe has a digging depth of 76", a reach of 113" and bucket digging force of 2800lbs. It swings 180 degrees. All those specs exceed the numbers I could find on the PT425 or PT 2425 with BH. Turning radius for the CK20 is 96" which I think is 1" more than the PT425 (I am surprised by that).

The CK20S also comes standard with a 22hp diesel, an adjustable suspension seat, two range HST, R4 tires, power steering, instrument panel with tach, hour meter, temp and fuel gauges, cruise control, position control for 3PT and ROPS. Canopy would cost another $300. Weight with FEL about 2700lbs. Weight of PT425 about 1300lbs

I see the list price of the PT2425 is $13000 and the PT425 is $10000. To that add shipping costs (if I recall correctly that was well over $1000 for the 700 miles so at least $1.50/mile). Add $350 for a standard bucket. Add $1350 for grapple bucket. Add $3500 for the backhoe on the PT2425 or $1100 for the minihoe on the 425. Add $1100 for bush hog and $1400 for finish deck (don't forget to increase shipping costs). PT post hole digger $1200-1400 with one auger. Blade for snow removal $450. R4 tires $120

Notably the PT comes with a one year do it yourself non transferable warranty that specifically does not cover the engine or other parts that are not manufacturered directly by PT. I imagine there is a separate engine warranty probably for a year per industry standard. In contrast, the Kioti comes with a 4 year powertrain warranty plus two years "bumper to bumper" including the FEL and BH. Kioti warranty service by any dealership and it is transferable.

Looking at the total cost of a package consisting of tractor, FEL, grapple bucket, (add a grapple plus WRLong control for the Kioti) delivery, mid range finish and bush hog mowers, R4s would be: Kioti about $16000 delivered. PT425 $13970 plus shipping.

Looking at the TLB combo (as above but with BH on the PT2425 or Kioti): Kioti $20,000 delivered. PT2425 $20500 plus shipping.

I don't see any advantage for PT in this cost comparison. The PT425 shipping charges would jack the price up to within $1000 of the much fuller featured and warrantied CK20. Throw in even one new engine for the PT in it's lifetime and any price difference evaporates. The PT2425 TLB costs more than the Kioti TLB despite spartan features even without adding the shipping charges.

Yes, the PT will change implements faster and it weighs less and has better stability on slopes. Those are about the only technical advantages however and in returning to the original thesis of this thread, it does not seem to be "cheaper" than a comparable CUT. That is particularly true if you consider the resale values. CK20s with a few years and few hundred hours use sell for roughly 70-80% of new. Doesn't seem to be the case with PTs.

I do agree that for around the house and suburban yard that the PT425 is the handier tractor and can be stored in less space. A SCUT TLB like the Kubota BX24 would cost about the same as the Kioti TLB, maybe a tad less and would be comparable to the PT2425 in weight and storage size. For open fields and for bigger areas I'd imagine the Kioti CUT would pretty quickly outwork the PT in mowing and loader tasks. Overall costs of ownership over 10-15 years would also clearly favor the CUT.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #129  
I believe the PT is more expensive. When I had my Kubotoa is was diffcult to change attachments and hurt my neck when I used the snow plow for any purpose. So I used it maybe 20 hours a year. With the PT422, it was so easy to use and fleixble that I put 500 hours on it during the first 5 years. So I am sure it cost more to operate because it actually got used. I sold the Kubotoa and never missed it. If I switched back to the Kubotoa and got rid of the PT (perish the thought) I am sure I would miss it.
Gentleman, thank you all for your comments and the civil way that you have expressed yourselves. I think this thread will be very helpful for anyone trying to make a decision, and that's the main purpose. May you be happy with whatever your own.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #130  
IslandTractor said:
S. What if you want to lift a bucket 61" in the air? :)

I would put two 2 X 10's down and drive on them or get my car ramps out.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #131  
BobRip said:
May you be happy with whatever your own.

I want both.:D A big CUT for fields and a medium sized PT for the honey do list.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #132  
Well ....Island Tractor,
I would say that is an accurate dollar to dollar comparison!! :D Now if I might indulge myself a little here... I'd like to compare the lowly little 2004 PT 180 I sold. (I still have access to it anytime I need it ) to Mr's 425, Kent's 425, Bob rips 422 ?, and Snow ridge's (425 corrected )It seems the lowly 180 has the same size wheel motors. :eek: Gee I wonder if that means they all have the same size pumps??? ( maybe just a lower pressure setting on the 180... 2000 PSI VS. 2500 PSI. ). I am willing to state hands down that I could out dig the PT mini hoe with my custom mini hoe ( on the lowly little 180 ) both in speed and depth any day of the week!!!! :p Now... chew on that bacon awhile all you big bad pre-wheel motor upgrade 422 /425 owners !!! :cool: HA. HA. HA.
 
Last edited:
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #133  
Rivco said:
... I'd like to compare the lowly little 2004 PT 180 I sold...

OK, so once in awhile someone sales one. Get much for it...that's what this thread is about:D
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #134  
IslandTractor said:
I want both.:D A big CUT for fields and a medium sized PT for the honey do list.

Yes, exactly, if money were no object. :cool:
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #135  
Rivco said:
Well ....Island Tractor,
I would say that is a pretty good dollar to dollar comparison!! :D Now if I might indulge myself a little here... I'd like to compare the lowly little 2004 PT 180 I sold. (I still have access to it anytime I need it ) to Mr's 425, Kent's 425, Bob rips 422 ?, and Snow ridge's 422?... It seems the lowly 180 has the same size wheel motors. :eek: Gee I wonder if that means they all have the same size pumps??? ( maybe just a lower pressure setting on the 180... 2000 PSI VS. 2500 PSI. ). I am willing state hands down that I could out dig the PT mini hoe with my custom mini hoe ( on the lowly little 180 ) both in speed and depth any day of the week!!!! :p Now... chew on that bacon awhile !!! :cool: HA. HA. HA.
Ahem, SnowRidge tried to buy a 422, and Power Trac nixed it for "commercial use." I have it on good authority that he has a PT-425. :p

Assuming you are comparing the 180 to the 425, the pumps appear to be completely different brands, so there goes that theory. ;)
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #136  
SnowRidge said:
Ahem, SnowRidge tried to buy a 422, and Power Trac nixed it for "commercial use." I have it on good authority that he has a PT-425. :p

Assuming you are comparing the 180 to the 425, the pumps appear to be completely different brands, so there goes that theory. ;)


:D :D :D Ah yes but I believe the wheel motors are all 12.5 ci. for those model years and the 2004 180 :p
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #137  
Rivco said:
Well ....Island Tractor,
I would say that is a pretty good dollar to dollar comparison!! :D Now if I might indulge myself a little here... I'd like to compare the lowly little 2004 PT 180 I sold. (I still have access to it anytime I need it ) to Mr's 425, Kent's 425, Bob rips 422 ?, and Snow ridge's 422?... It seems the lowly 180 has the same size wheel motors. :eek: Gee I wonder if that means they all have the same size pumps??? ( maybe just a lower pressure setting on the 180... 2000 PSI VS. 2500 PSI. ). I am willing state hands down that I could out dig the PT mini hoe with my custom mini hoe ( on the lowly little 180 ) both in speed and depth any day of the week!!!! :p Now... chew on that bacon awhile !!! :cool: HA. HA. HA.
Hmmm...

If you look at my avatar on the upper left, you will notice a very large tree stump up in the air. I know for a fact it had to weigh in at a very close 600 pounds with dirt still attached to the roots. Every time I turned to fast, the business end of my 180 would come up off of the ground.

As you can see I just used my forks to lift it up and out no grapple needed. I dug it out using just my rock bucket with after market teeth. I had to chop a few roots and it took a long while but in the end, the little PT 180 took care of it. I'm sure the PT mini hoe attached to a nice 422 or 425 would have cut that time in half.

Add the custom hoe that Rivco made, and you have even more muscle, in a compact digging machine. :cool:
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #138  
Regarding operating costs, here is my experience:

Fuel use; in 550 hours, I've averaged just under one gallon (0.945) per hour.

At our nearly 8,000 ft. altitude that's not too bad. I had thought about diesel, but in the past have had some issues with diesel powered equipment that sits unused for 4 weeks and is difficult to start, especially in the heinou weather when minus 10 is a heat wave.

Something I haven't seen mentioned in forums, at least the ones I've read, is that for the last four years I've claimed and received a tax credit for the federal road tax that doesn't apply for non road use of gasoline.

The 18.4 cents per gallon is not much, but $2.56 per gallon sounds almost good compared to higher prices earlier this year.

I've become 'brainwashed' I guess, since I nearly expired when the price hit $1.95/gal., and now feel that less than $2.60 is a bargain!

But I digress!

Other costs in 550 hrs:

$195+$180 to repair rollover with heavier one now used
(This nearly $400 was something I don't think I should have had to pay)
$138 for two tires (includes shipping and mounting)
$45+$5 shipping for 3 Hydraulic Oil filters
$55 for 8 Hydraulic Oil Filters (after I went to NAPA 1551)
$41 for 11 Engine Oil Filters
$3 for Spark Plugs
$34 for 22 or so Quarts of Engine Oil
$9 for 2 Fuel Filters
$44 for 4 Engine Air Filters
$18 for 4 Engine Air Prefilters
$1,000 worth of aggravation for hand carrying flat tires out of inaccessible places several times (Not included in grand total below)

Grand total is therefore $767 for maintenance and repair, $1,163 for fuel for a total of $3.50 per hour for 550 hours.

Total delivered price with all implements was $12,450 (bought snow blade later and paid pretty high shipping).

Cost per hour including purchase and operation would therefore be $26.15, a number that would become $7.65 per hour including purchase and operation if I get to 3,000 hours without replacing the engine or pumps.

I'll probably reach that number as the engine starts and runs fine with minimal maintenance.

Repair costs in the next year will probably include a number of the large bolts in the lift mechanism.

All this is to say that the PT has been pretty low cost to buy and operate to this point.

Regards,
Mark H.
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #139  
Rivco said:
:D :D :D Ah yes but I believe the wheel motors are all 12.5 ci. for those model years and the 2004 180 :p
My PT's wheel motors won't be 12.5ci as soon as I can get the 22.7ci ones installed... :p
 
   / Power-Tracs are not cheaper in my opinion #140  
IslandTractor said:
I do agree that for around the house and suburban yard that the PT425 is the handier tractor ...

Maybe that would explain why my best friend who's storing MY PT-425 at his place in TN (9.5 acres) has put over 150 hours on it during the last two years, while HIS 30 HP Kioti has only had about 50 hours put on it -- and almost all of that with his RFM...

He mows about 4 acres of wide-open space with his Kioti and 6' RFM. Other than that, "the toy," as he refers to the PT-425, gets used about 3:1, even though he has a comparable set of 3-PT implements for his Kioti...

Now that I've demonstrated to him how well the rough-cut mower works on the PT, and he's tried it for himself, that ratio may get even more lopsided, regardless of how much fuel it burns in comparison...

I still don't believe that those who haven't lived with a PT for a while can't really understand their value... :confused:

But, I've ranted enough in this thread already... :eek:
 

Marketplace Items

CASE DX18E TRACTOR (A60430)
CASE DX18E TRACTOR...
500BBL WHEELED FRAC TANK (A58214)
500BBL WHEELED...
CAT D8 (A58214)
CAT D8 (A58214)
IRET13 ELECTRIC TRICYCLE (A58214)
IRET13 ELECTRIC...
John Deere Z997R (A60462)
John Deere Z997R...
Jack Daniels Miniature Decorative Truck (A59231)
Jack Daniels...
 
Top