News Source(s)

[EddieWalker]

If I was interested in having a debate with you, I would provide links that support what I'm saying. Since the topic is a out news organizations, and it's already borderline getting closed down, I'll just say that by the fact you havent seen anything that supports my comments is proof that the media doesnt report what goes against their agenda.

If you want to read up on Cocid19 and how effective Hydrox has proven to be when used early on, and as a prophylactic, try DuckDuckGo instead of Google.

Can you produce the facts behind your opinion per your statement?

You didn't answer my first question directed towards you per this thread on comments you made, so I give it a 50/50 chance you answer this question per this thread.

 

[downsizingnow48]

I've gone several YEARS without watching any news at all. I sometimes search certain topics on DuckDuckGo or read a few national/neutral news sites just scanning the headlines, but I gave up TV news completely, even the local stuff.

Agree I have not watched tv news for decades. Just theater and propaganda. All of it.

 

[/pine]

Relating to google searches....a whopping 41% of the first page search results return queries to google owned sites and resources...

If you want to see how biased google is visit the site cited below:

Alphabet Inc Profile: Totals • OpenSecrets

 

[k0ua]

The real question becomes what good would it do? Yes you could drag up the Ford study showing the efficacy of Hydroxy. But whose mind would be changed.

. I can assure you that anything dredged up and proffered in front of someone on a forum would not change anyone's mind. Not anyone here, not anyone anywhere. Peoples minds are not changed, by your "facts" because they have their own "facts". Everyone see's EVERYTHING thru their own lens. If I told you the earth was an oblate spheroid, many people would disagree with it.

What is "fact" to me is conjecture to many others. Just like Gerald Nadler denying there are riots going on in Portland Oregon. Just flat out denying it. 70 days of rioting, many federal police officers injured, they built a steel fence to protect the courthouse, and they brought battery powered angle grinders with cutting wheels to cut it down. But NO, to Gerald Nadler, they are just "peaceful protest".

So how can you refute "facts"? Easy. So Sig, replying to you, just like this post is a total waste of time. NOTHING Eddy can say will change your mind about ANYTHING. You know it, I know it, even Yellow Dog* knows it.


* Line from "funny farm" with Chevy Chase, Yellow dog was a yellow dog. But not a very energetic one.

 

[TBone]

Eddie, Eddie, Eddie ..... So many things so wrong in a single post.

I agree. Another classic example of opinions, not facts.

 

[k0ua]

I agree. Another classic example of opinions, not facts.

And I disagree.. I agreed with everything Eddie said. In spirit and word. So there you have it, you have your facts and We have ours. You are on one side and we are on another.

 

[TBone]

I, too, have been a regular reader of Yahoo for a long time. Some articles are fact based, some are opinions and some are outright lies. The Lord blessed most of us with the wisdom to discern the difference. Yahoo reprints articles from both conservative and liberal news agencies so I have never felt it leaned strongly one way or another. I, too, was disappointed in the loss of the comments at the end of the articles. I always enjoyed reading the ones that disagreed with my views as well as the ones that thought the same way I do. It was my understanding that the results of the survey they are taking (I took it) will determine if the comments come back. I hope they do and will probably not be a follower if they do not.

 

[Diggin It]

you have your facts and We have ours. You are on one side and we are on another.

And that's what's so wrong. Facts should be facts. Indisputable. Water consists of two hydrogen molecules and one oxygen molecule. That is a fact. It cannot be disputed. The 'news' should be the same, indisputable. The should be no your news and our news. A car ran off the road and hit a tree. There should be no question if it did or didn't.

 

[/pine]

And that's what's so wrong. Facts should be facts. Indisputable. Water consists of two hydrogen molecules and one oxygen molecule. That is a fact. It cannot be disputed. The 'news' should be the same, indisputable. The should be no your news and our news. A car ran off the road and hit a tree. There should be no question if it did or didn't.

LoL... I see physics was not your strong suit...!

The FACT is that water consists of two hydrogen ATOMS and one oxygen ATOM...together they make a molecule

 

[k0ua]

And that's what's so wrong. Facts should be facts. Indisputable. Water consists of two hydrogen molecules and one oxygen molecule. That is a fact. It cannot be disputed. The 'news' should be the same, indisputable. The should be no your news and our news. A car ran off the road and hit a tree. There should be no question if it did or didn't.

It doesn't work that way, and hasn't for some time now. There is no such thing as the loyal opposition any more. You doubt our motives, and we doubt yours. Tell me it isn't so.