News Source(s)

[Diggin It]

This is another one I've never noticed any bias on. They simply provide the stories, most of which their staff write:

CNS

 

[EddieWalker]

I think you misspelled offensive, biased and divisive.

true. the truth will hurt a lot of peoples feelings that prefer not to know the truth

 

[Steppenwolfe]

Drudge Report posts news stories from all around the world that they think are important. They don't write the news, just provide the links. Since Trump won the election, they have become very anti Trump and their links lean that direction more then I care for, so I rarely go there anymore. Breitbart and RealClearPolitics is very pro Trump, and I like that they provide links to their sources, but a lot of their stories are more opinion then just the facts. The UK Telegraph has more in depth information on US politics than I've found in any US news sources.

A few years ago, PEW Research Center did a study on the big three cable news networks and fond that FOX was 50/50 in their coverage of both political parties. CNN was 5 to 1 in favor of the Democrat Party and MSNBC was 9 to 1 in favor of the Democrat party. I like FOX news over all the other main networks for both watching on TV, and reading online.

Tucker Carlson is easily the most outspoken, honest and informative news person currently on any channel.

Worse then lying about what has happened, like Nicholas Sandman, is ignoring what is happening, like the riots in Portland. If it doesn't fit the agenda, the media will ignore it or pull it, like they are doing over Hydroxychloroquine.

God Bless America... You listen to what you want, and I can listen to what I want. I have no problem with that. Just try not to hate me for it...And I you.

 

[Steppenwolfe]

true. the truth will hurt a lot of peoples feelings that prefer not to know the truth

We each decide our own truth. I believe there is only One Universal Truth, and 50% of the world disagrees with me... So, there is that.

 

[Diggin It]

I honestly feel sorry for anyone who thinks TC speaks the truth. It tells me they have serious issues with mental stability and well being.

 

[EddieWalker]

I honestly feel sorry for anyone who thinks TC speaks the truth. It tells me they have serious issues with mental stability and well being.

I believe the word you are looking for is Projection. People accuse others of what they know to be true about themselves.

 

[NorTracNY]

Thank you all for the suggestions. For the one sad individual, that had to be an exception, I'm sorry the topic of news wouldn't allow you to be civil and respectful. I hope you posts at least made you happy.

 

[Sigarms]

Drudge Report posts news stories from all around the world that they think are important. They don't write the news, just provide the links. Since Trump won the election, they have become very anti Trump and their links lean that direction more then I care for, so I rarely go there anymore. Breitbart and RealClearPolitics is very pro Trump, and I like that they provide links to their sources, but a lot of their stories are more opinion then just the facts. The UK Telegraph has more in depth information on US politics than I've found in any US news sources.

A few years ago, PEW Research Center did a study on the big three cable news networks and fond that FOX was 50/50 in their coverage of both political parties. CNN was 5 to 1 in favor of the Democrat Party and MSNBC was 9 to 1 in favor of the Democrat party. I like FOX news over all the other main networks for both watching on TV, and reading online.

Tucker Carlson is easily the most outspoken, honest and informative news person currently on any channel.

Worse then lying about what has happened, like Nicholas Sandman, is ignoring what is happening, like the riots in Portland. If it doesn't fit the agenda, the media will ignore it or pull it, like they are doing over Hydroxychloroquine.

The irony is this is what you believe. If you read what you wrote, it's seems apparent you are pro Trump ("verified" reporting on pro vs anti trump). If I'm wrong in my assumption, please correct me.

Tucker Carlson has his own issues.

That said, no biggie, we all believe what we want to read to some extent IMO.

The reality is reporters now a days all seem to have their own agenda.

I try not to rely on only one news source if trying to form an opinion and try to read on opposing views before forming my own opinion on what the "truth" actually is.

Not that it matters, but I haven't been a fan of the POTUS for the more than the last couple of elections.

How you get into what is the best news source without becoming somewhat a "political hot potatoe" is beyond me

The reality is all news sources to some extent are politically biased. Been happening since day one since the formation of our own country.

 

[Diggin It]

The reality is reporters now a days all seem to have their own agenda.

I try not to rely on only one news source if trying to form an opinion and try to read on opposing views before forming my own opinion on what the "truth" actually is.

How you get into what is the best news source without becoming somewhat a "political hot potatoe" is beyond me

The reality is all news sources to some extent are politically biased. Been happening since day one since the formation of our own country.

This is why you don't rely on any single site. You use an aggregator or check multiple sites that are known to be less biased in general.

It's kind of like price shopping before making a purchase. Check around with multiple sources, then form your own best plan.

 

[kenmbz]

This is why you don't rely on any single site. You use an aggregator or check multiple sites that are known to be less biased in general.

It's kind of like price shopping before making a purchase. Check around with multiple sources, then form your own best plan.

I agree-it seems their are less news sources that do fact checking and remain unbiased.
Probably due to so few owners of the news sources. I used to watch BBC as at least they were less biased about goings on in the US, but everyone seems to have taken sides making it harder to find out any facts.