Here is a good test. Today, Sally Yates testified in front of the Senate, under oath, about what she knew and what she did concerning the Russian Collusion investigation, General Flynn and the FISA warrants. Her testimony was very bad for the FBI.
Did your news source report this? By not reporting something a big as the FBI lying under oath to spy on people, by
Another test. When it comes out that what your source of news has been telling you is wrong, do they correct it, or do they go on to something else? How long until you find out that what they have been telling you wasn't true, and why do you continue to support them?
Covington Kid that was accused of attacking, belittling and just being mean to a Native American Drum player was a complete lie.
The rest of the video footage of George Floyd just came out and it shows him resisting arrest, claiming that he couldn't breath before he was put into the police car, shows him climbing out of the police car. He is clearing very high on drugs.
Rioters in Portland destroying buildings and attacking officers.
What about Trump calling Covid a Hoax? How many continue to believe it?
What about Trump being a racist for saying both sides of the people at Charlottesville are good people?
The last two examples are proof that the media lies, because they took each example out of context. Both are easily proven if you watch the entire speech. So when you learned that your news source lied to you about these two things, why did you continue to listen to them?
If you actually want to know what's happening with the corruption at the FBI, then John Solomon is by far the best, most connected person reporting on this with all the documents to support what he is saying. He just started a new website that I'm not very familiar with.
Just The News