QRTRHRS
Elite Member
GMC also had a V12 gas engine which was 2 V6 blocks molded together. It had two carbs, two distributors.
most 70’s-90’s diesel vocational trucks were underpowered EMPTY.
210HP was the normal power rating for a 33,000LB dump truck.
That’s absurd.
GM/Detroit did all kinds of variation on the diesels too. The 71 series ranged from one, two, three, four and six cylinders, and the V-types six, eight, twelve, sixteen, and twenty-four cylinders. The 92 series ran v-6 to v-16. Other series had a number of variations based on common parts too.GMC also had a V12 gas engine which was 2 V6 blocks molded together. It had two carbs, two distributors.
Lol, ask for a Tanker and you get a plane, right?GM/Detroit did all kinds of variation on the diesels too. The 71 series ranged from one, two, three, four and six cylinders, and the V-types six, eight, twelve, sixteen, and twenty-four cylinders. The 92 series ran v-6 to v-16. Other series had a number of variations based on common parts too.
They also made reverse rotation versions of some engines
We had a GMC Topkick 3000 gallon water tender(Tender not Tanker) with 8V92T at our fire station. That thing was LOUD during pump operations. I van only imagine the 16V92 at rated RPM; must be an amazing cacophony of sound!
Lol, ask for a Tanker and you get a plane, right?
Nice shot.
Yes, there are some differences in nomenclature West Coast vs Midwest vs East Coast. But when things hit the fan, the job gets done !Nice shot.
On the East Coast, if you ask for a tender you get chicken!
GMC also had a V12 gas engine which was 2 V6 blocks molded together. It had two carbs, two distributors.
It’s still hard to find single axel trucks with any power. Ford has been putting 6.7s in 650s and 750s for the last 10 years or so but before that they were using 5.9s or 3116 cats. The 6.7 is better but it’s still underpowered if you actually want to use a 750 to do 750 things. The vast majority of those are fleet trucks and I think they’re under powered on purpose to save fuel and keep drivers going slower. Ford is still building medium duty trucks with gas engines.
In 1959 our national pride, Daf, came out with a 5.75 liter 165hp turbo diesel. They started building engines just two years prior by purchasing a license from Leyland, and where Leyland itself never got their turbo engines right, eventually leading to its demise, Daf got it right.When I was volunteering at the local fire station, we had a couple of Ford 7 and 8 series cab chassis based Beck and Van Pelt buildups(one was '86, the other '89 if memory serves...). They both had CAT 3208T's. They worked well, but best you could get was 58-60mph on the freeway. One was covered by paid staff and used a lot. It just never got anywhere on the highway very quickly. Funny thing is, that Engine is now a taco truck...
Well then here you go. Enjoy:I had never heard of the GM Toroflow even though I worked with a number of early and mid sixties GM's/Chevys. All gassers.
A guy I worked for in my teen years/early 20’s had a late 80’s Ford flatbed with a 360 4 speed manual in it and even running empty, you’d have to drop down from 4th to 3rd to climb a modest hill.
Man, those 80s-90s vintage tacomas couldn't get out of their own way empty, don't even want to think about how much of slug they'd be with a load like that!Anyone remember the small Toyota dually, build of the pre-tacoma truck, used by Uhaul. 2.4L 4 cylinder. I think its rated for 87 hp?View attachment 4093915
I had a '91. It was tough as nails but as you say; going down the interstate with my ATV in back, sometimes I'd have to shift into 4th. There's one intersection in Vermont where I'd stop on a hill, then turn left. I learned to put it into 4lo until I got on flat ground.Man, those 80s-90s vintage tacomas couldn't get out of their own way empty, don't even want to think about how much of slug they'd be with a load like that!