SPYDERLK
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 10,323
- Location
- VA
- Tractor
- JD2010, Kubota3450,2550, Mahindra 7520 w FEL w Skid Steer QC w/Tilt Tatch, & BH, BX1500
The original question has been dealt with in several ways. It is an evolving job and I dont think OP has settled on a method yet. He has had lots of good advice and will get more when asked for.Define complete. Look at the original question then define complete in the context of all the pissing. Pretty sure there is sufficient information for anyone wanting an answer to the original question to consider it "complete enough" to make an informed and safe decision. This isn't about an unwillingness to gloss over a physical reaction to which important distinctions apply....and if it is, look at the previous 35 pages and ask how beneficial that stance has become.
In the mean time there has been a dispute about the accuracy of a claim made about pull point. You see that as a problem. So do I. It is a problem to base bold conclusions on incomplete pertinent information. It can make one too cautious or not cautious enuf. All because of a ready acceptance of the quick answer or deduction that seems right. Im surprised you didnt make that connection with your example experience.