Hay Dude
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Messages
- 16,727
- Tractor
- Challenger MT655E, Massey Ferguson 7495, Challenger MT535B, Krone 4x4 XC baler, Kubota F3680 & ZD331 Ram 5500 Cummins 4x4, IH 7500 4x4 dump truck, Kaufman 35’ tandem 19 ton trailer, John Deere CX-15
As said before, we asked them.Maybe part of the problem is a failure to communicate instead of directly asking SEPTA? They might say they don't have the money to take care of all of it. They might say you could have access to the bridge if they were provided with adequate proof of insurance? Maybe they'd abandon the whole thing to the conservancy? Maybe the conservancy doesn't want the responsibility of dealing with future log jams?
If they granted access, would the work be easier, less risky, and more cost effective?
The point is it's impossible to know without communicating effectively.
No access permitted.
Honestly, I see no advantage of working from the tracks. They are deteriorated, dangerous and pretty high.
Not to complicate things, but there’s a grand plan in the works where SEPTA will remove iron tracks (not the ties) and the Conservancy wants bids to remove all ties, install new ties/sleepers and a wooden walkway with railings.
But that’s a whole ‘nother discussion.
For now, the need is to keep the water flowing as freely as possible to reduce high water levels during floods.