Citydude
Super Member
This Corona lockdown has got me doing things I have not done in years... like making hash browns. It has been probably 10 years.
View attachment 648428 View attachment 648429 View attachment 648430
Oh man, that looks good.
This Corona lockdown has got me doing things I have not done in years... like making hash browns. It has been probably 10 years.
View attachment 648428 View attachment 648429 View attachment 648430
At exactly what point did we become a society that instead of listening to a doctor's advise and following it...We started telling the doctors what medications WE thought we should be taking...mostly based on advertising, hearsay etc...?
Well, you drink a beer and I'll start my 5 day dosage cocktail if I get it.
Polio vaccine was administered to most of the US population over a few weeks, and within weeks of final authorization, in about 1953. I was a little kid, maybe it was longer, but that's what I remember hearing at the time.Even if they come out with a magic vaccine/cure just the worldwide distribution will take months if not years.
As an academic research scientist, I fully understand the concerns. However, the sad state of the matter is that self-promotion and science go hand-in-hand in today's research climate. If you aren't self-promoting, making strategic connections, etc., your chance for continued research productivity through a steady stream of funding is about zero. I can't count the number of program managers that have told me, "I'm not funding a project/research question based on the scientific merit, I'm funding an individual." That doesn't mean I agree with that approach (I find it very disappointing), just that it's a necessary evil.
I think where part of the backlash comes from is the sheer amount of publicity that was received in the public media, which then outraged everyone else. I'm sure a fair amount of that is jealousy as well. "Why was their study highlighted by news media, and mine not?". I doubt the authors even anticipated the amount of traction they would get from that study. I regularly read peer-reviewed journal articles that are more flawed and more outlandish in their claims than what this study was. That still doesn't mean there isn't useful information that can be gleaned from them. As a scientist, our goal is to find the truth, and move it forward. There can be useful information in very flawed studies. In most cases, scientists reading the articles and doing research in related fields recognize this and can distinguish between claims that are backed up by the data, and those that are speculative.
A level head in response to all research claims (good and/or bad) is needed to move scientific fields forward in a methodical and progressive manner. This is not effectively accomplished by striving to tear down others based on ones perceived views of their flaws. Most scientists realize how small their respective research communities are, and that a respectful, collegial approach is needed by all. If not, as one researcher once told me, "it quickly turns into a circular firing squad." You see those exact behaviors exhibited on this forum. What is this, CoronaVirus thread #7?!?!
Yes, self promotion is a part of academia. But it must be ethical and not be irresponsible. Putting out a pilot study on YouTube before discussing it with the scientific community in a pandemic situation is dangerous and wrong. Non scientist types who do not immediately recognize the pilot/preliminary nature of the findings will act in unpredictable ways. Did the Marseille scientist know that POTUS would leap to embrace the findings before proper confirmation was available. He should have thought about that especially after that is exactly what happened. Has anyone seen a second YouTube from this group urging caution and pointing out the need to do more sophisticated studies before national policies and clinical decisions are made? I haven’t seen a hint of that. Yes, research is competitive and self promotion is part of the game but this group in Marseille has gone well over the line and is irresponsible for not putting their work in context, especially after it is clear the scientific community has expressed serious concerns. You can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater and similarly you shouldn’t yell “cure” during a pandemic.
A local friend of ours suggested instead of demonizing the "domestic immigrants" in our towns,
we offer to help them with shopping, fuel etc., so they don't have to go out and potentially spread the virus.
It's a win/win. They stay safely ensconced and we get to be good neighbors. Worth a thought.
OTHERS misinterpreted their results. That is not their fault.
I think we are going to have to agree to disagree.If someone as powerful as POTUS misinterprets your work and urges rapid adoption in a press conference, a responsible scientist issues a clarification. If you know your work is being acted upon prematurely then an ethical scientist doesn’t sit on their hands and enjoy the free publicity. If they do then it is their fault.
Fauci was correct in deferring action. So was the head of the FDA (before he folded). The Marseille group should have backed them.
A choir practices...out of 60 people, 45 sick and 2 dead. Did they think they were immune? Nursing homes around the country are infected. We are only getting started with this mess.
2 Choir Members Died Weeks After Rehearsal amid Coronavirus Spread | PEOPLE.com
Gooey... you are not going to get a better chance! Freshen up!With this lockdown neither my wife nor I have been in public much and are deferring showers to a large extent. Why bother?
Every now and then we ask each other if we stink.![]()
At the church I attend, we have a lot of good people. Many are not critical thinkers. There is a huge tendency to å*µroup think? There is also a high degree of trust in the pastor and a desire to conform. They are called sheep for a reason.
I suspect a number of those choir members had second thoughts about attending the function but did not have the courage to bow out.
It bothers me when some say, 的t is in God痴 hands and God痴 will?...when God has not directed man痴 choices.