ponytug
Super Member
All the best, Peter
2012 Ram 3500 6.7 has been fantastic. Only wear and tear items until about 270k then had some major repairs. Turbo, radiator, delete due to egr, and transmission recently at 300k. 320k now and still my daily work truck.Well, despite the 2019 Ram brake module problems the OP is having, I am just about ready to make the decision to buy a 2027 Ram 5500 crew cab 4x4.
I like most of what I am reading, except the more stringent EPA standards…..
My 2020 Ram has been outstanding. Can’t imagine it with a 25% bump up in torque to the Cummins and even heavier towing specs.
2012 Ram 3500 6.7 has been fantastic. Only wear and tear items until about 270k then had some major repairs. Turbo, radiator, delete due to egr, and transmission recently at 300k. 320k now and still my daily work truck.
I bought a 2023 3500 6.7 in 2024 with 15k. 40k now no issues so far but mainly driving the 2012 still unless longhauling.
Friend of mine has a 2018 ram 2500 gasser and it has been loaded with electrical and sensor issues almost from the start. Not sure if I've been lucky or he was unlucky.
All to be expected. The 2012 spent a lot of its life towing pretty heavy. I bought the 23 for something more reliable due to the mileage of my 2012 but after fixing the major stuff decided to keep it to keep the miles off the 23. I'll probably drive the 12 until the next expensive repair pops up. Probably injectors. All are still origional.Those repairs at 270-300k don’t sound abnormal to me.
Yes, that was my thought, too. Inverted flares with threads aren't known for sealing well to tubing are they?Fitting in foreground is cone seat, such as this:
View attachment 4809080
yeah, you'd have a heck of a time getting any hose to stay on one of those.![]()
Being that the vehicle was built and certified with the anti-lock braking system, Stellantis will own the liability if people get hurt in an accident. I would assume that is forcing the do-not-drive warning.![]()
Interesting thread, one that hit's close to my situation.True, but in a case like this where you have a vehicle that is under recall and is 'undrivable' due to that recall (in the legal sense, anyways) and the OEM is unable or unwilling to provide the repair, or even the part, to fix said recall and thus remove the 'Do Not Drive' order..?