troutsqueezer
Veteran Member
Brevity is the soul of wit.
It would be a tall order I think to do it with current technology.
The Voyager space probe travels at 0.00567% of the speed of light. (17 km/sec)
To reach a star 4.37 light years from earth in 50 years requires traveling at 8.74% of the speed of light, or 1,541.45 times faster than Voyager(s) which I think attained their speed by planetary gravity slingshot.
That would require some type of propulsion system. This is a round-up of some other propulsion ideas:
Gallery: Future in Space
I don't think NASA will have any trouble filling the seats for a one-way journey to Mars or anywhere else. Mars One Over 200,000 applied within a short time and supposedly 705 of those are initially viable candidates.
Indeed my friend. I sometimes wonder if Earth is actually the size of a grain of sand in the grand scheme of things.
Mastering the the fabric of space/time is the ticket...
But first of course, humanity would have to stop needing to spend huge amounts on war and war preparedness and direct that to something with lasting usefulness. Doing that requires re-framing our values as a species; we would have to transcend our basic natures.
It would be a tall order I think to do it with current technology.
The Voyager space probe travels at 0.00567% of the speed of light. (17 km/sec)
To reach a star 4.37 light years from earth in 50 years requires traveling at 8.74% of the speed of light, or 1,541.45 times faster than Voyager(s) which I think attained their speed by planetary gravity slingshot.
That would require some type of propulsion system. This is a round-up of some other propulsion ideas:
Gallery: Future in Space
I don't think NASA will have any trouble filling the seats for a one-way journey to Mars or anywhere else. Mars One Over 200,000 applied within a short time and supposedly 705 of those are initially viable candidates.