Hill Climbing Primer

[SPYDERLK]

Top, near side as I recall. It is irrelevant.
larry

 

[ovrszd]

Top, near side as I recall. It is irrelevant.
larry

Come on Larry, you know it's relevant.

Why is the load on the top of that bearing??

 

[SPYDERLK]

Come on Larry, you know it's relevant.

Why is the load on the top of that bearing??

Because it is turning the composite ring gear/wheels forward against resistance outside the tractor body. That part is relevant.

 

[CalG]

Maybe this example helps, maybe not.... Looking at Egon's picture of the ring gear and pinion gear. When turning to move the vehicle forward. Where is the greatest load on the pinion bearing closest to the pinion gear??? Top?? Left side?? Right side?? Bottom??

Of course the corollary question, "Where is the greatest load on the ring gear support bearing closest to the pinion. And, is it's magnitude equal to the force on the pinion bearing?"

Of course, equal and opposite..... (give or take vector math)

 

[JWR]

Course it matters which way it rotates -- the wheels that is. ... Now, - Physics says that a pull point below tire contact rotates the tractor to put more weight on the front wheels. Pull above the ground and the tractor can backtip.
larry

On the 244th post it is very possible you guys are off on some other topic than I know about. This relates most closely, I hope, to SPYDERLK post #213.

"Is there an engineer in the house ?"

This got way too complicated to get simple answers and insight. Forget for the moment whatever may be going on inside the machine. Also forget for the moment anything dynamic and think static, initially. See the diagram (which you may have to blow up to see.) The relevant torque equation is (W x L1) - T1 - (P x L2) = 0 where T1 is the negative "wheelie torque", WxL1 is positive torque from the weight of the tractor acting over a lever of length L1, and P x L2 is the negative torque from the load acting over a lever of length L2. This equation sets the boundary condition at which the tractor is just balanced ready to rotate about the pivot point where the rear tire touches the ground and later/potentially about the rear axle. In this static circumstance nothing is moving yet. To me this lends a lot of insight into the physics of the problem.

Note that T1 "wheelie torque" is just the very familiar feature of powered vehicles that tends to raise the front wheels preceding and during acceleration. We do not need to delve inside the machine to list that term in the equation. So many things can be learned from the equation. 1) Both the pulling force "load" and the wheelie torque act in the same direction. The Tractor weight over the lever arm L1 is the only term operating clockwise. 2) Thinking incrementally from the static situation, exactly balanced but no motion yet, ANY ADDED LENGTH L2 (raising the pull point) WILL CAUSE NET NEGATIVE TORQUE AND IT WILL START TO TIP BACKWARDS. 3) Any added wheelie torque (e.g. applying more power and starting to create movement) will also tip the machine backwards or start to do so. 4) Any added pulling load will also tip it backwards. 5) Some definite conclusions can be made. The height of the pull point (drawbar) on the tractor certainly matters as do all the terms in the equation. 6) So long as nothing is moving yet, the frame of the tractor is acting as a stiff member whose pivot is NOT the rear axle but rather the tire contact point on the ground.
Once the situation is dynamic and not static, we have a much more complex physics problem. First, all of us talking here realize that as a practical circumstance the tire will slip/spin and the torque amounts all change but clearly with LESS chance of tipping backward. If there is enough traction OR if a sudden event (like popping the clutch) occurs, then tip over backwards can start. If this occurs slowly enough (the Penn State safety study referenced many posts ago says on the order of 3/4 second elapsed time) then the "wheelie torque" will decrease, the front of the tractor will come back down and the next hurdle becomes traction again. If there is still enough traction then potentially the tractor could be tipped backwards. The chances of that traction being adequate to produce backward tipover are very small because the only way that can happen is if the tires have more than 1.0 coef of friction with the ground -- in other words the treads have dug in and gotten hold of something solid enough to pull on and produce significant force. Can't happen on pavement. Could happen on just the right tread depth into just the right hardness of soil and grabs a root or something. "Ain't going to happen." As the Penn State Safety center article pointed out, though, if the machine ever gets tipped back very much, then L1 is decreased and tipping gets easier/more likely to a point of no return. I rest my case.

 

[Egon]

Thanks for the diagram and static to dynamic conditions.:thumbsup:

 

[ovrszd]

Of course the corollary question, "Where is the greatest load on the ring gear support bearing closest to the pinion. And, is it's magnitude equal to the force on the pinion bearing?"

Of course, equal and opposite..... (give or take vector math)

As is usually the case,,, I'm not sure what you just said and whether it is relevant. Please just answer the question as to "Top", "Left Side", "Right Side", "Bottom"???

 

[SPYDERLK]

On the 244th post it is very possible you guys are off on some other topic than I know about. This relates most closely, I hope, to SPYDERLK post #213.

View attachment 372945 "Is there an engineer in the house ?"

This got way too complicated to get simple answers and insight. Forget for the moment whatever may be going on inside the machine. Also forget for the moment anything dynamic and think static, initially. See the diagram (which you may have to blow up to see.) The relevant torque equation is (W x L1) - T1 - (P x L2) = 0 where T1 is the negative "wheelie torque", WxL1 is positive torque from the weight of the tractor acting over a lever of length L1, and P x L2 is the negative torque from the load acting over a lever of length L2. This equation sets the boundary condition at which the tractor is just balanced ready to rotate about the pivot point where the rear tire touches the ground and later/potentially about the rear axle. In this static circumstance nothing is moving yet. To me this lends a lot of insight into the physics of the problem.

Note that T1 "wheelie torque" is just the very familiar feature of powered vehicles that tends to raise the front wheels preceding and during acceleration. We do not need to delve inside the machine to list that term in the equation. So many things can be learned from the equation. 1) Both the pulling force "load" and the wheelie torque act in the same direction. The Tractor weight over the lever arm L1 is the only term operating clockwise. 2) Thinking incrementally from the static situation, exactly balanced but no motion yet, ANY ADDED LENGTH L2 (raising the pull point) WILL CAUSE NET NEGATIVE TORQUE AND IT WILL START TO TIP BACKWARDS. 3) Any added wheelie torque (e.g. applying more power and starting to create movement) will also tip the machine backwards or start to do so. 4) Any added pulling load will also tip it backwards. 5) Some definite conclusions can be made. The height of the pull point (drawbar) on the tractor certainly matters as do all the terms in the equation. 6) So long as nothing is moving yet, the frame of the tractor is acting as a stiff member whose pivot is NOT the rear axle but rather the tire contact point on the ground.
Once the situation is dynamic and not static, we have a much more complex physics problem. First, all of us talking here realize that as a practical circumstance the tire will slip/spin and the torque amounts all change but clearly with LESS chance of tipping backward. If there is enough traction OR if a sudden event (like popping the clutch) occurs, then tip over backwards can start. If this occurs slowly enough (the Penn State safety study referenced many posts ago says on the order of 3/4 second elapsed time) then the "wheelie torque" will decrease, the front of the tractor will come back down and the next hurdle becomes traction again. If there is still enough traction then potentially the tractor could be tipped backwards. The chances of that traction being adequate to produce backward tipover are very small because the only way that can happen is if the tires have more than 1.0 coef of friction with the ground -- in other words the treads have dug in and gotten hold of something solid enough to pull on and produce significant force. Can't happen on pavement. Could happen on just the right tread depth into just the right hardness of soil and grabs a root or something. "Ain't going to happen." As the Penn State Safety center article pointed out, though, if the machine ever gets tipped back very much, then L1 is decreased and tipping gets easier/more likely to a point of no return. I rest my case.

I agree sorta. The rail dragster for instance. But I think there are mental games to play to get a pretty good handle. Huge linear acceleration provides the load. Wheres that pull point? Cant forget the huge initial rotational acceleration of the wheels.
,,,Where I think static describes dynamic easily and well is in a steady state pull -- no acceleration.
larry

 

[jimpen]

Do you all realize that at this point you all are now getting into minutiae (the small, precise, or trivial details of something) of this?

Basically it boils down that if you hook to the drawbar (or below axle height) with anything you want to pull and are reasonable about trying to drag it you'll be fine. If you hook to the 3PH with no attachment to the drawbar your chances of an flipover are higher but not guaranteed.

If you link to the top link only of the 3PH you are probably doing it wrong.

So just freakin give it up already.

 

[JWR]

Spyderlk said: I agree sorta. The rail dragster for instance. But I think there are mental games to play to get a pretty good handle. Huge linear acceleration provides the load. Wheres that pull point? Cant forget the huge initial rotational acceleration of the wheels.
,,,Where I think static describes dynamic easily and well is in a steady state pull -- no acceleration.
larry

Yes mostly agree. I'd comment however that there would not normally be very much rotational acceleration of the wheels unless they slip and suddenly spin. Under what I think are normal circumstances when the static circumstance changes to a a dynamic one, things (should) begin to happen very slowly, too slow for large amounts of rotational torque due to acceleration. The pull point on the tractor in my diagram at least is L2 feet off the ground. Units being in foot-pounds.