- Joined
- May 12, 2004
- Messages
- 13,255
- Location
- Northeast Ohio
- Tractor
- Kubota B2910, Cub Cadet Pro Z 154S, Simplicity 18 CFC, Cub Cadet 782
Here's a few of my recently (yesterday) completed home-built root rake/grapple ... I'm sure lovin' it so far:
Here's a few of my recently (yesterday) completed home-built root rake/grapple ... I'm sure lovin' it so far:
View attachment 465286
View attachment 465287
View attachment 465288
View attachment 465289
Here's a few of my recently (yesterday) completed home-built root rake/grapple ... I'm sure lovin' it so far:
You can say that again... too bad we don't have the double post problem anymore :laughing:And you should. Pretty dang nice! Good job!
That was the idea ...Interesting and quite novel clamshell design. I like the fact that the upper arm pivot point is moved forward a foot or so. That will prevent the dreaded "pinch point" problem inherent to clamshells where the first log is clamped but prevents the grapple from closing further so the rest of the load falls out.
My pleasure.Show us more of what it can do.
Thanks ...Nice work!!
Thank you very much.And you should. Pretty dang nice! Good job!
Sure, wide open:rswyan, can you show us some photos of your grapple without a load to demonstrate the geometry wide open and fully closed? Side view would be best.
Sounds good to me ... :thumbsup:The pivot point arrangement is unique. I thought initially that the pivot point was forward of the frame but another TBNer pointed out that actually there is a pivot point at the frame it's just higher than on a typical clamshell. It looks to me now like you avoided the pinching problem of a scissor type joint by designing in a void with "C" type upper jaw so there is never contact between the upper jaw and back of the grapple as happens with a typical clamshell. What do you call your design? A cantilevered clamshell????
Sure, wide open:
View attachment 465344
Works pretty good for raking too:
View attachment 465346
Jaw opening, tip to tip = 55 1/4"
Jaw height from ground when open, with lower jaw/frame oriented vertical = 54"
The one below is of it closed ... BEFORE I cut off some metal on the upper jaw arms (where it was contacting the bottom of the hydraulic cylinders and preventing it from closing further) and lengthened the hydraulic cylinders by 1/2".
It closes a little further now - the tips of the upper jaw are probably within an inch or so of the slots in the root rake:
View attachment 465345
Sorry ... don't have any current side view pics of closed in it's current config. If I can remember I'll snap some later today ...
Sounds good to me ... :thumbsup:
:laughing:
Rswyan, have you weighed your grapple yet? If you haven't then let's start a pool to guess the weight. I'm in for 425lbs.
.
Rswyan, have you weighed your grapple yet? If you haven't then let's start a pool to guess the weight. I'm in for 425lbs.
-------------------------------------
Or maybe start the weight pool here?
http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/build-yourself/320507-root-rake-grapple-kubota-b2910.html
Nope, not yet.Rswyan, have you weighed your grapple yet?
LOL ... great idea !If you haven't then let's start a pool to guess the weight. I'm in for 425lbs.
Thanks again.It really looks great.
Likely true.I'm trying to image the practical pros and cons of your design. It does appear to be pretty heavy and is certainly stout. I'd imagine that a traditional clamshell would hold a single small log more securely for bucking but that yours would do that job as well as any standard root grapple (like mine).
I think that may be the case ... but I haven't tried to put it to the test, until I get some expanded metal to cover the lower frame.Your grapple will certainly hold more brush than a regular clamshell too because it doesn't have the scissor joint.
Having used neither of those you mention I couldn't say for sure, but it seems to be working pretty good so far.Yours would be much more efficient than either a standard clamshell or open bottom type grapple at collecting scattered tree branches.
I have less of a lever ... but (theoretically) more of a mechanical advantage I believe, because the lever is shorter.I'm guessing that the relatively short bottom tines would be a disadvantage in levering and popping roots with the FEL ...
The limitation appears to be the stoutness of the FEL arms ... not the grapple ......but the stout design would permit lots of pushing.