tradosaurus
Super Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2017
- Messages
- 5,979
- Location
- Texarkana, TX
- Tractor
- Kubota MX5400 HST, heavy duty bucket, 3rd function, R1 tires (rears filled), 2 remotes
too much risk. I would pass.
I appreciate the opinion.too much risk. I would pass.
I know you know the difference between a lake and moving water. Moving water is a whole 'nuther animal.I would do exactly that, but here’s the difference on my project (IF it becomes my project).
1. Rivers have current. If you hook to a larger log and it breaks free, the current could drastically multiply the resistance pulling the log. That could be a disaster. You had the benefit of no current in a lake.
2. You also had the benefit of not having a log jam. When your logs were pulled across the lake, there was no risk of all of them breaking free and floating down a river, doing possible property damage.
I am still thinking wait until river is wadeable and cutting logs off a small piece at a time and letting them float away. Still has risk, but little overhead cost and smaller chance it all breaks free at once.
That’s all I have anyway (rope), but point taken. I do have winch cable, but I’m hesitant to use a vehicle to pull to the rivers bank.Instead of cable, I would use a rope strong enough to pull the item, but weak enough to break before it pulls your machine into the river,
And much easier to rope logs while in the water than cable them….Use both attach the cable to the rope then you can cut the rope if it starts to pull the truck..
Yep, blow it up while firewood size chunks of wood fly through those giant windows LOL![]()
Easy! Just point the dynamite AWAY from the windows! Let me know if you need and further advice...
![]()
OMGHow far down does that jam go (depth into the river)? How much are you expected to remove - just the logs, or the built up sandbar?
I realize that this thread is an attempt to mitigate the following, but
this guy got mocked mercilessly for this speech but he had a really good point:
I'm still in the camp of "this is too big a job". Removing the logs on top of the sandbars removes the unsightly mess, but it's the tip of the iceberg and next year it's going to start piling up again. Sure, the logs on top catch other logs that much more easily, but you're talking a very short term "solution", and the solution is only a solution to the immediately visible problem and not the root.
Definitely seems like the liability is on the bridge; if I was the rich museum, I'd sue the RR company to make them take care of their bridge and ensure they understand the huge liability they have.
Meanwhile, if you insist on taking the job, perhaps there's some US Army floating bridge kind of thing that's available ... somewhere... (link)?
View attachment 848599
in the "drought months" shouldn't be a problem to set that across the river, and you could get a decent excavator on it.