Global Warming?

[Egon]

What of man's activity caused the Medieval Warming? How about the climate conditions that left the palms found under the Antarctic ice? Those dinosaurs using coal cause that climate in the Jurassic? Just wondering how all the previous warmings are explained so this one alone can only be explained by AGW.

Aww, the Table Setting got shifted by a big basement Ruckus. Yes!:thumbsup:

 

[IslandTractor]

What of man's activity caused the Medieval Warming? How about the climate conditions that left the palms found under the Antarctic ice? Those dinosaurs using coal cause that climate in the Jurassic? Just wondering how all the previous warmings are explained so this one alone can only be explained by AGW.

Nobody said man or dinosaurs contributed significantly to earlier epochs of climate change. It is an irrelevant and naive point that doesn't address the current AGW question/debate. How about digging up some scientific data to support your anti AGW viewpoint instead of setting up straw man arguments.

 

[tcreeley]

Crazy weather, global warming at work!

 

[Filedreport]

Global Warming or not. Cost of oil, solar, wind and other form of energy we just got hit by a 50 Billion dollar tax bill in the Northeast. Which will be easier to pay in the long run if we don't get a hold of this warming?

 

[EE_Bota]

Crazy weather, global warming at work!

I view it more as one that got through.

 

[IslandTractor]

Crazy weather, global warming at work!

Crazy weather no doubt. Who knows if this was AWG related or just the random alignment of the stars though.

 

[/pine]

Crazy weather no doubt. Who knows if this was AWG related or just the random alignment of the stars though.

:laughing: equal credibility

 

[toppop52]

Nobody said man or dinosaurs contributed significantly to earlier epochs of climate change. It is an irrelevant and naive point that doesn't address the current AGW question/debate. How about digging up some scientific data to support your anti AGW viewpoint instead of setting up straw man arguments.

No, it's a perfectly legitimate question, one you cannot balance in the AGW equation, so you and the other Deciples of the religion ignore it, or worse attempt to discredit millions of years of reality to support your cult. But then that's what ultisols do.

 

[Loren49]

Well supported response :confused2: The scientific community does not support your view and your comparison to religion does not help your case. Repeating a claim of that sort does not improve its validity. Check out the volume of data and scientific papers used to support AGW and compare that to basis for religion. (religion results from belief and faith that sacred book is the truth)

Loren

 

[Loren49]

Well supported response :confused2: The scientific community does not support your view and your comparison to religion does not help your case. Repeating a claim of that sort does not improve its validity. Check out the volume of data and scientific papers used to support AGW and compare that to basis for religion. (religion results from belief and faith that sacred book is the truth)

Loren