One thing I did watch was the YT video posted early on in this thread concerning the Maverick and I found it interesting, the comments about lacl of quality control, use of cheap plastic components and the obvious lack of competent design and shielding on the underbody, especially in the rear section of the truck. With anything that costs as much money as the Maverick does, I'd expect a bit more care in assembly, better underbody shielding and higher quality components that would last a few years or at least until the vehicle was paid for which, in my view, is not the case with the Maverick. Of course with today's creative long term financing, that may be 10 years or more and I don't see that vehicle lasting that long, especially up here in the north with the snow and salt coated roads in the wintertime. I'd gibe it maybe 5 years before corrosion and failure of cheap components renders it a bomb.
Nice thing about road salt and CACL is you don't realize the sheet metal is corroding until you can see it coming through on the outer skin. Then it's too late.
Iv'e lost count of how many late model pickup trudks and cars I've observed driving down the e-way with terminal rust in the fender's and between the rear bumpers and the tailgates or trunk lids. I bunch and I bet none of them are over 5 years old as well.
Freindly (waving) fenders are common up here in the north, it seems.
I guess you just keep buying new as the old one rusts away. Viscous circle and continuous payments.
Not for me.