California
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 15,016
- Location
- An hour north of San Francisco
- Tractor
- Yanmar YM240 Yanmar YM186D
I'm familiar with Rancho Seco. I could have worked building it long ago when I belonged to the Carpenter's Union. And I'm a ratepayer at my home in the valley, served by SMUD, its owner. SMUD is still one of the lowest-cost utilities in California despite continuing today to pay off the high cost for building, retrofitting (many times), and de-comissioning that failed project.Restart is also being considered for the Duane Arnold plant in Iowa. There are other nuclear plants that were perfectly good units that were shut down for political reasons or because of competition from cheap natural gas. They include /Rancho Seco and San Onofre in California, Zion in Illinois and Indian Point in New York but they will be harder to restart.
It wasn't shut down from 'politics' unless you advocate for gross incompetence. It was almost never in production between years-long shutdowns to try out expensive new overhauls that were promised (and failed) to make it work right. Top management was a merry-go-round of claimed experts who couldn't get it to work right.
Frustration that the ratepayers related to the politicians was a component of the shutdown but the end came when it was revealed that the published figures for radiation released downstream into an adjacent creek were in fact lies. The measured one-hour figures were published as 24 hours radioactive discharge. This deceit was the final straw.
Somebody put an initiative on the ballot to abandon Rancho Seco. It passed.