Citydude
Super Member
What I found interesting and a bit irritating was that farmers are excluded from the loan packages.
Yes. Keeping all the restaurants afloat is moot without food products.
What I found interesting and a bit irritating was that farmers are excluded from the loan packages.
Every day @jburnmurdoch increases the log Y-axis plot for US cases, and each day the US doesn't fit on the chart
I feel as though this is only going to end with herd immunity at this point. We will need ~ 70% infection rate I believe I read for it to die out.
Containment doesn't seem to be working, or should I say, people aren't following directives.
New York Times reports Italy is thinking of testing for antibodies people have after they have recovered from covid 19 and then letting them go back to work. I wonder if the U.S. could do that of if it would be beyond our capacity?
Chris
I feel as though this is only going to end with herd immunity at this point. We will need ~ 70% infection rate I believe I read for it to die out. Containment doesn't seem to be working, or should I say, people aren't following directives.
When someone goes on a ventilator, just what does that mean? Other than they can't breathe for themselves. I know they put a tube thru the nose into your lungs, and breathe for you. Does that mean you're unconscious? Either because you're in such bad shape or do they put you to sleep? Is someone there monitoring the machine constantly? What is the probability of recovering once you're on a ventilator? How long is someone normally on one before they are removed either by recovering or by not needing it anymore?
So much wrong with that graph...or am I missing something.
With two identical infection rates, if one country has 300MM people it will have more cases than a country with 50MM people.
If you do no, or minimal testing, you get fewer cases.
Case 1 One country with 300MM tests 5% of the population with an infection rate of 50%...number of cases is 7.5MM
Case 2 Another country with 50MM tests 5% of the population with an infection rate of 50%...number of cases is 1.25MM
Case 3 Another country with 50MM tests 2% of the pollution with an infection rate of 75%...number of case is .75MM
Which country is doing a better job of containment?
Numbers need to be normalized to mean anything. IE. cases per 100,000 tested would have some use.
So much wrong with that graph...or am I missing something. ...
Here’s a video where I explain why we’re using log scales, showing absolute numbers instead of per capita, and much more:
Boy was that fast! They were talking about it being a couple day or so to get everyone off... the sick being first. Great news to hear she is home. Probably some stories to tell but being cooped up in an inner cabin, maybe not so much?Yesterday morning I was surprised to see live pictures of the MS ZAANDAM entering Fort Lauderdale, well this morning I was surprised to learn that my Aunt had not only been tested OK (as far as that can go) but then placed onto a chartered aircraft, flown out of the US and is now HOME! Yep, she still has to go through another 14 day quarantine, but not locked down in an internal cabin.
I briefly Skyped her as soon as my Sister told me she was home and asked her, "So, what did you bring me?!" :laughing:
There is something very interesting in these plots. That is, the two lowest countries, S. Korea and Japan (not shown on this plot but very similar to S. Korea) have something in common.
I would think apartment buildings, and condos with shared entries, stairwells, and elevators would be a high risk place to be. No way to keep the separation required by social distancing. As well as the potential common areas touched, even inadvertantly.It seems to be working in rural areas, but the U.S. cities are having a hard time. I suppose when your neighbor is 10 ft. away it's hard to keep your distance.
When someone goes on a ventilator, just what does that mean? Other than they can't breathe for themselves. I know they put a tube thru the nose into your lungs, and breathe for you. Does that mean you're unconscious? Either because you're in such bad shape or do they put you to sleep? Is someone there monitoring the machine constantly? What is the probability of recovering once you're on a ventilator? How long is someone normally on one before they are removed either by recovering or by not needing it anymore?
It means your lungs can't provide enough O2 to your tissues to survive and must be supplemented by artificial means, eg, the ventilator. Short term patients are intubated, meaning a tube is inserted in their throat to provide an open pathway. Most patients are not unconscious, but are given sedatives and a paralyzing drug to keep them from fighting the vent. It is very uncomfortable to have a tube in your throat and the natural reaction is to get it out NOW. Once certain perimeters are met, staff will attempt to 'wean' the patient off the vent by removing it for short times to see if the patient can breathe on their own and maintain minimum O2 stats. The machine is generally used in ICU so staff is always nearby to monitor the machine. It can and will keep breathing for you even if you die, because the machine doesn't know you are dead. It pumps air or a mixture of O2/air. Time on the vent is dictated by your ability to recover. Some paralyzed accident victims are on the vent forever. Long term patients are trached for a more comfortable tube placement but that is a surgical procedure.