any downside to hst?

/ any downside to hst? #142  
Soundguy said:
Just flipping thru a couple NH manuals, and some JD and cat HE manuals.. i see lots of cat and JD equipment with torque converters in the tranny.. I don't see alot of torque converters on many tractor HST trannies.

Perhaps we are being a bit loose in what is a 'hydro' trans.. etc.

Soundguy
I'm just going by the product literature. The dozers are all advertised as having "hydrostatic" tramsmissions. Maybe someone out there that has actual operating experience can chime in with a more definitive answer.
 
/ any downside to hst? #143  
The Caterpillar track skidsteers have dual closed loop hyd. axial psiton pumps that drive a hyd. motor on each of the drive sprockets. Excavators are set up about the same way with a drive motor on each track sprocket,but has an open loop system to run the hoe functions. The hystat dozers have two variable-displacement axial piston pumps mounted tandem-style to the flywheel and a pump on each track.
Whats nice about the hystat heavy equipment is when you go to nuetral they STOP. If the CUTS had the same setup as a CAT dozer they would truely be an awesome machine.
 
/ any downside to hst? #144  
Sounds like some new equipment...( something we don't have an abundance of.. ) I'm guessing the 'hystat' is the big difference... Much of our older iron is torque converter driven.. save for a few that actually have hydro pump / motor drives.. like some old rollers.. etc.. and excavators.. etc.

I know our cat pans have torque converter style trannies.. very similar to a car tranny... choose a gear, and then you have an accelerator pedal.. etc.

Mad ref.. I'm guessing you don't count pans as real heavy equipment then right? even the 23 yard and 31 yard jobs..??

Soundguy
 
Last edited:
/ any downside to hst? #145  
Let me add my 2 cents to the efficiency thing. True fuel efficiency is not hours/gallon, it is work accomplished per gallon. If an HST tranny burns 10% more fuel to put a given amount of power to the ground but saves 15% in economy of motion (i.e. the operator can keep the wheels turning at the desired speed/direction at all times) it will be more fuel efficient. That doesn't even factor in the labor saved. Also if it runs fewer hours to accomplish the same work the periodic maintenance costs will come down.

By the way I have and prefer gear tractors myself. I like the feeling of knowing just what I've got between the motor and the ground. Reading this thread I could probably get used to a HST but I don't mind a little extra excercise. Lots of people spend time and money working out. I prefer accomplish something when I work.

Brad
 
/ any downside to hst? #146  
I think it has been mentioned in passing, but the OP asked about the downside to HST. I think the benefits have been well explored and for the most part there aren't any huge downsides except cost. And more specifically cost vs hp. I'm not talking about hp loss vs a geared tractor. I'm talking about what amount of hp can you get in a geared vs an HST for the same amount of money. That's where you get into a pretty big difference, and if you need the hp, a pretty big downside.

I have a Kubota L4400. As basic a geared model as you can find. No GST or shuttles or even synchro (theoretically you have to stop before shifting...I can shift on the fly if things are timed right.) It is a 45hp tractor. I wanted the most powerful tractor I could get for under $20,000. The L4400 is it.

Take a look around and see the max hp you can get for $20k in an HST machine. It is considerably less.

The dealer gently pushed me towards an HST machine. I think he showed me a 3400 at a similar price and a 4130 at considerably more. I wanted, and as it turned out, need the additional hp.

So don't forget that there are some folks who might enjoy and benefit from HST that simply can't fit it in our budget and still get the power that we need.

I also happen to be one of those types who see no particular use in power windows and I currently despise the automatic transmission in my F150. Maybe I'm a control freak, but I prefer manual trannies in my vehicles. As soon as I'm done with this F150, I'm going to find something with a manual. Maybe an F250.

As far as operating the L4400, I'm super comfortable with it and can do extensive loader work without ever thinking about shifting or even look down to shift. Of course, my 43 year old left knee is sore after doing a lot of loader work. No arguing that. But for mowing, BBing, etc. No knee pain.

The other thing that affected my decision was repairs. I have a B-I-L with a complete tractor shop 1/2 mile down the road. He repairs all his big tractors himself including engine and tranny rebuilds. But he has never cracked anything but a full manual. With that in mind, plus the dollar to hp ratio, a geared tractor is perfect for me, especially since I'm a manual kind of guy anyway.
 
/ any downside to hst? #147  
Hmm.. downsides? Hard to come up with any true disadvantages.. I can only think of ones where you are stuck because the trans has run out of oil.. like a blown line on a loader that sucks the sump dry.. or a blown cooler.. etc.

With a gear unit.. in an emergency.. you could keep going. I guess the old railroad track analogy... with a gear unit, you can jump jimmy starter while in gear and make a gear unit walk across a track.. oil or no oil in the tranny.. etc.

Again.. not real mainstream issues...

Soundguy
 
/ any downside to hst? #148  
There is a down side for HST's in the winter. (Real winter, not that stuff you guys in Florida have ! LOL!!!!) When it is below zero you have to warm up the tractor for a considerable amount of time to thin the fluid for the HST to be happy. At -30F, you need to warm it up about 30-40 minutes. I have blown the HST filter out multiple times in the past -- but not since getting the latest rev of the filter! However, the tractor still needs to warm up a lot longer than a gear tractor.

jb
 
/ any downside to hst? #149  
Hmm... synthetic UTF??? may have a good real world app .....

Soundguy
 
/ any downside to hst? #150  
massiveSnow said:
besides cost, is there any downside to an hst transmission? are there any applications for which you would prefer a powershift or conventional manual?

No, not really.
 
/ any downside to hst? #151  
Soundguy said:
Hmm... synthetic UTF??? may have a good real world app .....

Soundguy


Well, I have blown out filters with UDT, Amsoil stuff and SUDT. The old style(s) of filters couldn't take the pressure from the charge pump. New filters seem fine, but only time and old man winter will tell for sure. Nothing like walking a 1/2 mile or more back to the truck to make a run for a new filter and jug of SUDT when it is brisk out. That's Cheese head talk for less than -20F. A bit nippy is less than -30F and chilly is when your beer freezes, while you swallow it!

jb
 
/ any downside to hst? #152  
So much for the amazing cold flow properties of synthetic oil that is thrown around like a miracle catch all answer to end all the worlds problems...

Soundguy
 
/ any downside to hst? #153  
Soundguy said:
So much for the amazing cold flow properties of synthetic oil that is thrown around like a miracle catch all answer to end all the worlds problems...

Soundguy


Does the world have any problems beyond the high kinematic viscosity of nonsynthetic dino oils at all ambient and operational temperatures? :rolleyes:
 
/ any downside to hst? #154  
I really don't think most people buy a certain transmission in their tractor because of the initial cost,if they are going to lose or gain a couple hp. do to a certain trans. or what it is going to cost for a repair, if needed somewhere down the road.They just want a tractor that best suits there paticular needs.I bought a tractor with a hyd. shuttle shift and creeper gears, may have ended up costing me more than an hst which is what I was going to buy and wanted in the first place.I haul logs out of the woods , pull heavy ground engaging epuipment etc. so the dealer rep. and tractor dealer said I wouldn't be happy with hst.. I took there word for it and went with the hyd. shuttle shift, do to a knee problem, I went with creeper gears for the snow blower.They didn't have the tractor I wanted on the lot,they had to install the creeper gears which I got at cost of the gears so they were not trying to pull a fast one over on me they were just being honest.There are many different types and sizes of tractors and all for a good reason,what will it be used for.I really wanted hst but I am very well pleased with what I have as it meets my needs very well.Is there a downside to hst,in certain applications it seems there is,in many other applications I would think it would be better.I have hst in my lawn tractor and would never go back to gear drive for that application for sure.
 
/ any downside to hst? #155  
HEC said:
I really don't think most people buy a certain transmission in their tractor because of the initial cost,if they are going to lose or gain a couple hp. do to a certain trans. or what it is going to cost for a repair, if needed somewhere down the road.

You may be right about most people, but I certainly did. All of the above in fact. And I think all of those things _should_ be considered, in proper perspective of course. But as you say, in all probability it rarely is.

I came to the market as a new tractor buyer. I like manual transmissions, I've driven various off and on road fork lifts, a few old farm tractors, big telephone utility (pole) trucks. So, the geared models didn't seem too intimidating to me. But, climbing up on it the first time to test drive it, it does take a minute or two to get oriented and a bit longer to get a feel for it. I think when a new potential buyer comes along who rarely drives a stick-shift in his car or truck and has never driven any 'equipment' other than his riding lawn mower, the ease of HST probably takes away a lot of the anxiety and intimidation of buying and using a new tractor. The geared models have levers sticking up everywhere, two accelerators, two brakes, etc. When the dealer points to the HST model and says all you have to do is press the pedal, well, that has to be reassuring and I think after that point, that buyer will consider nothing but HST. And that's fine. As pointed out, HST is clearly a great thing to have so the new buyer really isn't losing anything. Except, as I mentioned, he is getting significantly less hp per dollar. As long as the hp he is getting meets his needs, everything is great.
 
/ any downside to hst? #156  
Wow, My hat's off to you George! That was the best overall explaination of why HST is so popular with new to tractors buyers.

(I still like HST more than the old stop to shift for ease of operation)

jb
 
/ any downside to hst? #157  
Whew this is a heavy topic !! :eek: Did hear my grandmother comment one time about the viscosity of my gramps brain! ;)
 

Marketplace Items

UNUSED KUBOTA M1524 BRUSHGUARD PARTS (A62130)
UNUSED KUBOTA...
2015 Ford F-350 4x4 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A61568)
2015 Ford F-350...
New/Unused AGT MX-CRT23 Mini Skid Steer (A61166)
New/Unused AGT...
UNUSED SDLANCH DIAMOND PLATED PLASTIC MATS (A62131)
UNUSED SDLANCH...
2025 Pabreak 80in. Hydraulic Dual Cylinder 4-in-1 Bucket Skid Steer Attachment (A61567)
2025 Pabreak 80in...
Unused Midea 1834G1A Commercial Microwave (A60352)
Unused Midea...
 
Top