2520 Lifting a JetSki?
- Thread starter bheston
- Start date
- Views: 6465
Willl
Elite Member
Duc, what I found came from Deere.ducati996 said:
While the 2520 cx200 loader will lift more than 775 lbs or whatever is stated, I think what some people on here can't seem to accept, while the loader can clearly lift more it's a question of safety.
I think John Deere numbers are rated to match a safe load to weight ratio. Meaning 775 lbs or whatever is what the 2520 is rated to safely lift and drive around with. YES you can lift more but I think you want to be very very careful driving around with more weight.
These are baby tractors, if lifting way over 800 lbs is very important get a bigger tractor. The 2520 can lift over 1000 lbs but when it only weights 2000 lbs give or take it will not take much to go arse over tea kettle.
I think John Deere numbers are rated to match a safe load to weight ratio. Meaning 775 lbs or whatever is what the 2520 is rated to safely lift and drive around with. YES you can lift more but I think you want to be very very careful driving around with more weight.
These are baby tractors, if lifting way over 800 lbs is very important get a bigger tractor. The 2520 can lift over 1000 lbs but when it only weights 2000 lbs give or take it will not take much to go arse over tea kettle.
ducati996
Banned
Willl said:
pick a loader or machine, I dunno where it came from but this link is live and more accurate and up to date -would you not agree?
Product Specification for 400CX Loader
jcmseven
Veteran Member
The lift specs mentioned are at full height. I know Chris has lifted much heavier weights with his loader on the 2520, but I wonder if that was at full height. Full height is pretty high, much higher than one would seem to need to service a jet ski. One might be looking at 2 to 2.5 times the lift ability at 4 ft. for example v. full height. That would put the 200cx on the 2520 at a lift capacity of around 1500-1800#, if not slightly more, at a lesser height. This is one aspect the spec sheets here do not address. I think both parties can be correct. Although I have not owned one personally, I think the rate-limiting step of the 2520 with the 200cx is the ability to safely ballast the weight it can lift. Even with my 3720 I have been able to lift the rear of the tractor free of the ground when the bucket has been wedged under a large, embedded rock, so I know it has far more capacity than its rated 1598# at just over a foot less lift height.
John M
John M
ducati996
Banned
JDCAN said:
Its nice to have a small powerful machine that fits in close quarters, and is easily transportable, manuverable and dosent cause more damage than what you started with. That happens with larger machines or using skid steers or the like. Getting a larger machine is the easy part, getting a machine to accomplish most of what you need and stay within certain size limits, tends to get more difficult. Keep in mind this type of machine (with deere) has been around for a number of years starting with the 4100 series in 1998. Models also included were the 4010, 4110, 4115. Probably one of the best ever produced in the compact line regarding reliability and ability (my bias? maybe but the internet also supports what I suspect). Nothing suggested here is jeopordizing safety, or hasnt been accomplished in everyday use already or is it exceeding the ability of a tractor line thats been in existance for some time now. Anything related to proper ballasting requires the operator to follow what the manuals suggest - that will never change regardless of machine or capabilities
Duc
Chris2520
Platinum Member
jcmseven said:
No John i have not lifted super heavy things to max lift. and would not want to. I have lifted over 2000 pounds 2 feets. so i know your tractor will out lift mine. so the 1598 to 2 feet for your tractor is a Crap spec as well. Now i have lifted 1300 pounds to max height with no trouble at all.
witch answers the mans question that started this thread. Your 2520 will lift any jet ski made. I dont think any of them weigh over 1300 pounds. so the bottom line is , i answered the mans question.....
Chris.....
jcmseven
Veteran Member
I agree Chris. I suppose my biggest point to be made was that I think you are right and have given the poster good advice. I hope that you did not feel the response to be a comparision of the lifting capacities of the 200cx v. 300cx loader, as I mainly lift only mulch with mine (a Joke attempt). The original poster could lift what he wanted to a height of less than full height (but still plenty high) with a 2520/200cx combination. I do not though think the Deere specs are "crap" though. As we both know well, Deere has the fudge-factor they HAVE to figure in to account for things you or I would not consider. We both know your 2520 and my 3720 will lift with their respective loaders much beyond their listed capabilities. JD wants to advertise what their loader will lift on a given machine to a certain height one time, ten times, a thousand times, taking into account variations in hydraulic flow, seals, metal and component fatigue, etc. They also fudge a little for the less learned among us who will try things that are totally unreasonable with their machines. They really do not care much about a high number to post in the literature, they care about the maximum repeatable number they can guarantee to their customer who buys such a loader with such a machine and keep competitive with the field. You and I both know, and have respectively proven, that these machines will do far more than advertised, in reasonable use. Neither of us, nor probably any other poster in the forum, could duplicate the type and frequency of testing the engineers at JD do, nor can we accurately account for the variances that they must consider before publishing their specs.
John M
John M
Chris2520
Platinum Member
John , I do agree with you to a point. i know JD is just covering there self.
What i dont agree with. is i think thay fuge to much. to the point
of someone not thinking the machine is as capable as we know it really is.
in turn. some folks may buy another brand. thinking its more tractor .
when we know its really not... sometimes JD is so conservative on there numbers. it might hurt them. I know what these machines will really do. cause i have done it myself. not something i just read. I always felt Experence first hand is the best lesson or advise. So when people ask these questions. I will keep telling them the facts. and thay can decide for there self.. For the record. i have read what a 3720 and a 448 hoe can really do. thats why it will most likely be the next machine i buy. Then when people ask. i will be able to tell them exactly what a 3720 will lift. cause you know. I will put it to the max.
Chris.....
i know JD is just covering there self.What i dont agree with. is i think thay fuge to much. to the point
of someone not thinking the machine is as capable as we know it really is.
in turn. some folks may buy another brand. thinking its more tractor .
when we know its really not...
sometimes JD is so conservative on there numbers. it might hurt them. I know what these machines will really do. cause i have done it myself. not something i just read. I always felt Experence first hand is the best lesson or advise. So when people ask these questions. I will keep telling them the facts. and thay can decide for there self.. For the record. i have read what a 3720 and a 448 hoe can really do. thats why it will most likely be the next machine i buy. Then when people ask. i will be able to tell them exactly what a 3720 will lift. cause you know. I will put it to the max. Chris.....
