Runner
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 3,949
- Location
- Missouri
- Tractor
- 2024 Cub Cadet Ultima ZTXS5 54, 2007 John Deere 2520, 1989 John Deere 185, 1960 Panzer T70B
A few observations:Me. Usually not worth arguing with them, unless you’re already at final inspection, and won’t need to deal with them ever again. Either just go along with their stupidity, or undo it after they’re gone and the job is finished. Fighting them on it, even if you’re right, can cause the remainder of your job to go a lot less smoothly.
There are many good inspectors out there, but there are also many with Barney Fife’s desire to throw their weight around, at every opportunity.
Sometimes an inspector may not be biased one way or another, they just may not understand the requirement and are taking their best shot at an interpretation. This is especially true with the electrical code, but is common with all of them. My city (Kansas City, MO) has had two kinds of inspectors. In the "old days" all inspectors were ex-contractors, electricians inspected electrical, plumbers inspected plumbing, etc. After the Hyatt Regency disaster (1982 ?) they completely re-vamped the permits/inspections system. Up until that time, codes was a division of Public Works and they did things as mentioned above.
After that time, in interest of improving safety and professionalism, they created a new Codes Administration Department. They kept some of the old-line inspectors and plans examiners, but also brought in a new staff of architecture and engineering graduates to do the jobs of people who were fired. The old guys knew "everything" about their given trade, but had a tendency to require things to be done "their way" and specialized in their own trade.
The young guys (without intimate knowledge of any particular discipline) learned the codes from the ground up, had to perform multi-disciplinary inspections/reviews, and had to go "by the book" because they didn't have any other experience to go by.
Building departments spend huge amounts of time reviewing individual situations and generating interpretations to deal with them. At least in this city, there are people that spend almost all of their time making interpretations and reviewing individual situations for "code modifications".
If you are reading something in the code and the inspector seems to be at odds with what it says, it may be worthwhile to talk to their supervisor, or whomever in the department is in charge of making interpretations.
Most inspectors aren't really trying to be a jerk (some are.....), they are just trying to cover their azz and make sure they are getting things right. In my city, supervisors are doing spot-checks on inspectors and plan examiners to make sure they are not missing things or misinterpreting requirements.