I see a couple of interacting vectors at play....
To attempt to have me on-topic (I do try Gale, once in a while

).... this is a bit similar to the EV mandated landslide coming, in that solutions/legislation that resonate or are primarily directed to urban needs can end up causing issues or collateral damage out in the boonies.
Remote areas can have inversion issues too..... my lousy memory (somebody on here may know) isn't coming up with the town name, but I'm thinking wood bans in valley areas of AK (?).
Being objective about it, I don't like choking on wood smoke - much of the problem is that many people today don't get how/can't be bothered to burn a clean fire. How to enforce UnCommon Sense... if I could figure that one out, I could probably rule the universe
Even 10 years from now, if somebody in northern Alberta wants a 1 ton p/u to haul a stock trailer 1000km in a day, what will the choices be ?
Affordability - many people here have been forced to scrap perfectly functioning old wood-burning appliances (via the insurance/modern certification beating). Not a concern if you can afford a Tesla - may be a big deal if you are senior with limited income.
Similar ^ scenario we've looped through multiple times - high cost new EV vs. old well-maintained used car that's never seen salted roads..... if you have Money, that choice disappearing doesn't matter much.....
Rgds, D.