houser52
Gold Member
Haul that tractor on out to the factory, hook it up & play!!
I'll have the camera crew meet you out there.
Travis
Can't beat that. Sounds like your confident enough that if I hook up to it I'll want to leave it on.
Haul that tractor on out to the factory, hook it up & play!!
I'll have the camera crew meet you out there.
Travis
It's a great time for a friendly discussion.
I'm pretty sure some members have used both styles, so let's do it!
Travis
Can't beat that. Sounds like your confident enough that if I hook up to it I'll want to leave it on. ��
Great examples Xfax!
Travis
Exactly. I have both styles as well and find little use for the rake style. It is handy at times, mosty back raking and crude dozer work, but it is the least used compared to either L grapple.
Keep in mind that CUT FELs are designed and built for lifting, not bulldozing. Long and thin loader arms are nowhere near as tough as short stocky bulldozer arms. Pushing a "submerged" grapple into soil that may hide boulders and stumps or even big roots could result in off center strikes that could damage the FEL if enough momentum is built up. I'd prefer to do that type of work with a box blade or subsoiler.
Yes, as with anything, caution should be exercised, but Wicked tine design makes it easier, safer, more efficient for you to push up vines/roots and then scoop them up with one motion.
Travis
View attachment 500357
Sounds like this could be another pro for a narrow grapple?The issue isn't getting the tines to move efficiently through the soil, rather it is a risk of striking a large unseen object off center and twisting the FEL arms.
Yes, as with anything, caution should be exercised, but Wicked tine design makes it easier, safer, more efficient for you to push up vines/roots and then scoop them up with one motion.
Travis
View attachment 500357



