LD1
Epic Contributor
The add said it was in good shape. Also I have texts of him saying that all the tractor needed was small cosmetic things and after I contacted him about the weld he pretty much said he knew about it but forget to tell me. I have all this in text messages.
Unless the Judge reads the text message:thumbdown:
This is all the info we have so far about the text. We have the OP's interpretation of "he pretty much forgot to tell me"
Maybe the text is worded as such that it proves he forgot.....maybe not. At this point we dont know.
Beyond that.....one would still need to prove that the damage was beyond cosmetic AND that the seller intentionally forgot. Again, this could have been repaired 10 years ago, and been fine every since except for a small drip.
If I had any old tractor that when parked in the garage, left a drop or two of oil.....I'd have no reservations about calling it in good shape and only needs cosmetic things. If I were to sell my 1960's backhoe, I could write a 10 page list of everywhere that drips oil and everywhere that has a bit of weld on it. If questioned.....I wouldnt lie about anything. It is what it is. Like I said....you have to PROVE that the seller had the intent to purposely deceive the buyer. Not impossible....but pretty tough to prove