deepNdirt
Veteran Member
Hello Folks,
With the recent descussion of another members inquiry about a 3-pnt wood splitters, Rather then chiming in with nothing to add about the topic of his inquiry, I thought I'd start another topic comparing the two types of splitters available as an option,
Pros/cons etc,
Let me start by informing that a few months back I picked up a stand alone wood splitter at a very good deal,
It was actually a gamble if it would work, I bought it on the mans word that it would, The engine was Locked up so there were no way to test it, but for the price of 200 I took a chance,
Here was my idea: I thought I would get another engine ( which I have done so ) get it back going ---> and trade it for a tractor 3-pnt splitter, So! I put it up for trade and got many inquiries, I asked what size tractor they had used them on>? most replied with 30+hp tractors, so I figured it was out of the question for me to try using one with my smaller tractor,
This got me thinking, If I try using a 3-pnt splitter on my 1700 ...first off I'd have to rig it with hydraulic hookups, last time I did this with ( FEL) it cost me a new pump:ashamed:
secondly-- If when using one like this means the tractor has to to run at a very high RPM to produce the GPM needed,
thirdly-- due to runing the engine while sitting stopped, means more hours accumulating on the engine, These extra hours could be use otherwise,
Fourth-- the cost of rebuilding my tractors engine if something happen due to running it hard would surely exceed the cost of replacing a 4 stroke gas engine on a stand alone splitter,
So with these things as food for thought, I decided to keep the stand alone /towable splitter, I've used it twice and so far so good:thumbsup: (No extra hours on my tractor)
Now I would like to know the WHY for having a 3-pnt splitter??
With the recent descussion of another members inquiry about a 3-pnt wood splitters, Rather then chiming in with nothing to add about the topic of his inquiry, I thought I'd start another topic comparing the two types of splitters available as an option,
Pros/cons etc,
Let me start by informing that a few months back I picked up a stand alone wood splitter at a very good deal,
It was actually a gamble if it would work, I bought it on the mans word that it would, The engine was Locked up so there were no way to test it, but for the price of 200 I took a chance,
Here was my idea: I thought I would get another engine ( which I have done so ) get it back going ---> and trade it for a tractor 3-pnt splitter, So! I put it up for trade and got many inquiries, I asked what size tractor they had used them on>? most replied with 30+hp tractors, so I figured it was out of the question for me to try using one with my smaller tractor,
This got me thinking, If I try using a 3-pnt splitter on my 1700 ...first off I'd have to rig it with hydraulic hookups, last time I did this with ( FEL) it cost me a new pump:ashamed:
secondly-- If when using one like this means the tractor has to to run at a very high RPM to produce the GPM needed,
thirdly-- due to runing the engine while sitting stopped, means more hours accumulating on the engine, These extra hours could be use otherwise,
Fourth-- the cost of rebuilding my tractors engine if something happen due to running it hard would surely exceed the cost of replacing a 4 stroke gas engine on a stand alone splitter,
So with these things as food for thought, I decided to keep the stand alone /towable splitter, I've used it twice and so far so good:thumbsup: (No extra hours on my tractor)
Now I would like to know the WHY for having a 3-pnt splitter??