These kinds of money losing projects are exactly the reason why Spain is broke right now. They went on a huge spending spree with easy borrowing after joining the EU until reality caught up with them about 5-8 years later...
There is absolutely nothing novel regarding using molten salt to store energy. People have experimented with using it to store waste heat from the engine exhaust to improve fuel efficiency by pre-heating the engine from cold and making the catalyst work faster. But there is no way to do it in a cost effective way. It seems like a poor use of a lot of exotic material and you would have to imagine how long a place like that would be down after a close call with a tornado or hurricane and it would be a sight to see the landscape flooded with potentially toxic salt at 1000F like lava....
Many technologies don't come out of the gate being cost effective.... but I'm going to assume that you already know that...... so I'm not sure where you are coming from.
Are you saying that energy storage is difficult, so we shouldn't bother ?
Any industrial project has inherent risks. Like any major power plant, I'd expect all local significant risk factors to be accounted for in the design. Not sure if Spain has any notable hurricane or tornado risk; nonetheless I can't imagine this plant being built close enough to a populated area for molten salt to be a public concern.
Risk containment is a standard part of power distribution design. A
conventional power substation has large transformers that are oil cooled. Despite various levels of safeguards, transformer fires can and do happen. Concrete catch basins are designed as a last ditch containment measure - you can end up with a spectacular oil fire, but it is contained.
We could eliminate
all risks, by shutting down the grid altogether, but I don't think most people would vote for that approach.
Lithium is an extremely reactive metal - remember the early lithium battery fires ? Now people routinely hold these batteries in their hands, or beside their head for hours at a time each day.
Some technologies take decades to find a market acceptable home - fax machine technology dates back to at least the 1930s.
Without people willing to take on the financial and occasional physical risks present in the early stages of technology development, none of our dirt cheap "necessities" of modern life would exist.
For all the benefits that could flow from such a development, I'd like to see the Holy Grail of low-cost energy storage attained sooner rather than later. Getting there will take heading down dead-ends, and spending research money - if it was easy, we'd be there by now.
Spain is hardly the first country to explore fiscal irresponsibility, but this forum isn't the right place to engage in that type of discussion.
Rgds, D.