I'm guessing you had a gasser?
I do love my truck, it's a pleasure to drive, you don't hear that much coming from someone driving a 12,000 pound utility truck around. I know Dodge is #3 and it will always be.
The economy killed Dodge's big plans to cut into that C/C market that Ford dominates, but I was in the market for a new truck, I had to get it right since I'm a one truck contractor and can't afford down time. Now I don't have the hard facts but from what I remember Dodge had the heaviest frame and brakes in it's class, the engine even being new and unproven is a pretty safe bet, the tranny is awesome with longest warranty in the industry (can't be had in a pick-up though).
That's the one thing that kills me. I wish the Aisin could be had in the pickup.
I wouldn't worry about sales numbers. Let Ford have 'em. Eminem sold the most CD's last year. Any of you listen to that garbage? McD's sells the most burgers, but the were rated as having the worst taste. Sales figures are more a measure of the company's ability to MARKET a product more successfully than the competition. Give Ford credit for doing a great job with their brochures, but I have found the more you dig, the more you see that brochure numbers can hide the truth.
For example, Ford rates their new diesel as being 400HP. GM rates theirs at 397HP yet according to the first tests, GM puts out more rear wheel horsepower than Ford. Ford relies on their buyers being dumb enough to think that because their truck puts 400HP at the flywheel, it must put more power to the pavement than the 397HP GM diesel. Who cares about flywheel HP? Maybe kids do. I care about the power on the pavement.
Another perceived Ford advantage is front axle ratings. Ford will impress you with massive 5,200-5,800 lb front axle ratings while GM's are ~4,800-5,000lbs. You would think that means the Ford has to be able to carry a lot more weight on the front axle, but dig a little deeper and you find out GM's diesel engine weighs 300lbs less and their front axle componenets weigh considerably less. Suddenly the perceived GAWR advantage Ford had disappears.
I know the HP/TQ numbers are not the highest and as far as towing goes, Fords supposed to be highest but every one of those hot shot truckers I see with those huge loaded car carriers are driving Cummins powered Dodges. That's gotta tell you something, all Dodges every one I've seen. is it just the fuel milage? makes me wonder if the guy who needs to rely on a tow rig more than anyone else...... And I really mean rig, these things are operated like little over the road interstate long haul trucks. Gotta be something more than just manufacturers numbers that makes the right truck for the job.
John,
John I think it's because Cummins has traditionally had the longest B50 rating of the 3 diesel engines at 350,000 miles. This may have been equalled by Ford or GM recently, but the perception still exists. Cummins diesels have the least moving parts and have an excellent reputation based off the 5.9L platform. The long distance hauler boys like that type of reliability.
I bet you see a lot of the older 5.9L car hauler guys have the NV manual trannies in them too for even more reliabilty or if they have an auto, it's taken out and hardened-up.
Nothing I own is the "biggest seller", either, but I still manage to get the job done after nearly 25 years in 2 buisinesses.