Acehardly
Bronze Member
You think it would be feasible to make a 70A loader use this system?
I'd really like to make mine a quick attach.
Thanks...
Tony
I'd really like to make mine a quick attach.
Thanks...
Tony
You think it would be feasible to make a 70A loader use this system?
I'd really like to make mine a quick attach.
Thanks...
Tony
A no brainer. Yes ... if only to shed bucket weight when its a liability.QA buckets are nice, no doubt...but why, after all these years, do you think you need a QA bucket?
I am really interested in getting pallet forks and/or brush forks for it. It would be nice to have the QA. I am going to check out JDparts on the brackets for the loader side.
Thanks...
Tony
I'd be concerned about the distance between the arms. Is it the same as the 419 loader?
A no brainer. Yes ... if only to shed bucket weight when its a liability.
larry
I'd want it to match the JDQA arm width since I'm toying with adding to the fleet of tractors (another small JD, w/loader & QA) and I'd like anything I have for one work on the other. Forks or whatever I may add.It would not matter if he does a custom fab job...It may not meet the true JDQA specs but who care as long as it suits his needs.
The JDQA setup is truly a nice deal for CUT's bcause it is lightweight and does not move the implement (bucket, forks) out further reducing capacity. Some swear by the SSQA system-but that is just overkill for a small to medium sized CUT.
It isn't a weight factor for me, I take mine of when mowing (3-pt finish mower) & the tractor is stored inside, the bucket outside (shortage of space)!
Got the boom finished, both hook & boom have been cleaned up & painted after pictures were taken!
Next, a set of pallet forks! ~~ grnspot110