Who Broke The Bridge?

   / Who Broke The Bridge? #132  
Mentioning a Government policy may or may not be. It would depend on how it was phrased.

Mentioning a specific party, candidate or office holder in a desparaging or overly positive way or blaming or crediting them for certain events IS political.

It really isn't that hard to distinguish.
This is just "partisan politics"...something can be political in nature and not have anything to do with partisan politics...

...This is a privately owned and maintained site. Fairness is determined by those holding the reins.
...in other words hypocrisy rules...! LoL
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #133  
Rules are simple. No politics, religion and something else I can't remember. Why keep pushing it? Just refrain from address these topics at all. Muhammed even went to the trouble to setting up a new website so all of these topics could be discussed there and not on TBN.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #134  
The rules are like jello...there is no consistency...biases are blatantly evident...

Right now there is one thread that is so far out of hand it's not funny...in times past it would have been shut down well before now...!
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #135  
Yeah me neither.
But not with reckless, wasteful spending.

The funds need to be managed properly.

You know, like how you and I manage our bank accounts...

but if you really want to help pay for civilization with higher taxes, you can start by not cashing your tax return check this year. That will help keep the tax dollars flowing for our country!
I don't get tax returns.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #136  
And no matter who is signing the checks, Alabama, Tennessee or the feds, the people doing the work are likely to be private contractors not federal or state employees. The only difference is who's overseeing them and who signs the check.


Aaron Z
Thanks for pointing that out. Major infrastructure projects are handled by private contractors. The repair of this bridge qualifies as major.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #137  
The rules are like jello...there is no consistency...biases are blatantly evident...

Right now there is one thread that is so far out of hand it's not funny...in times past it would have been shut down well before now...!
Did you report it?
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #138  
That's hardly fair...if a mod is ignorant of the facts it's easy for a member to get banned for no reason...!

Pretty sure nobody has ever been banned from TBN for no reason. Maybe debatable reasoning but there's always a reason.
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #139  
...Did you report it?
Snitches get stitches...

...Pretty sure nobody has ever been banned from TBN for no reason. Maybe debatable reasoning but there's always a reason.
The point was...if the person doing the banning mistakenly thought a post was political in nature and banned the poster...it would be without (just) reason...

But then again there's likely a lot of innocent people behind bars...
 
   / Who Broke The Bridge? #140  
Right Arlyn - looks more like some type of stress fracture. The bridge is simply pulling apart. What type of construction method relies on rivets and not welds. I wonder - is this bridge old enough that welding was not available when it was constructed.
A bit of interesting trivia about the Sydney Harbour Bridge, from Wikipedia, "The bridge is held together by six million Australian-made hand-driven rivets supplied by the McPherson company of Melbourne,[16][17] the last being driven through the deck on 21 January 1932.[15][18] The rivets were heated red-hot and inserted into the plates; the headless end was immediately rounded over with a large pneumatic rivet gun.[19] The largest of the rivets used weighed 3.5 kg (8 lb) and was 39.5 cm (15.6 in) long.[14][20] The practice of riveting large steel structures, rather than welding, was, at the time, a proven and understood construction technique, whilst structural welding had not at that stage been adequately developed for use on the bridge.[19] "
 
 
Top