350c, welcome to the discussion!
"Revenge" and "Retribution" have been bandied about freely, the media is quoting the sources. Exactly who is going to be the recipient isn't clear, it could be the "deep state" (whatever that means, but the phrase plays very well to conspiracy theorists), it could be "immigrants" (remember, to the native Americans, we are ALL illegal immigrants, the definition seems to be "anyone who got here after I did"), or whoever displeases the government in power (no matter which one it is), and that is downright scary because there really is no way to know if YOU or I will someday be on the receiving end of that, or why. We're supposed to be a nation of laws, not a nation of vigilantes.
Fraud in Social Security? And in other government programs? Who'da thunk it? I doubt it is pervasive, because it appears they do pay attention to who gets the money and how much. Any time there is a lot of money floating around, there will always be people looking to beat the system and pocket some for themselves. An audit can't hurt, but going in with the idea that the whole thing is rife with fraud is probably incorrect.
I used to teach accounting, and there's something called the Principle of Materiality. If your accountant tells you it took him six hours but he found the dime your books were off, fire him. His labor cost you six times his hourly rate ($50/hr? $75/hr?) so how would you feel about paying $300/$450 to recover a dime?
Same thing - when we are talking trillions of dollars spread out over a bazillion often arcane government programs, there ARE going to be errors, and unfortunately, there is going to be some fraud. I don't like that, but I also don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water.
Drugs . . . this isn't going to be comfortable, but WE are the cause of the illegal drug trade. There's a huge market for drugs here (and to be fair, worldwide), if nobody wanted drugs, bought drugs or used drugs, the cartels would have to find some other way to make money.
If we could find a non-draconian way to significantly reduce demand, the supply would dry up because if nobody wants to buy the product, what's the point of making it?
We might want to look at WHY people buy and use illegal drugs, how they think drug use benefits them (hint- it doesn't), and find or create ways that give them the same (dubious and/or illusory) "benefits" but that don't involve illegal drugs.
Tall order, but we can dream . . .
Best Regards,
Mike/Florida