2LaneCruzer
Super Member
I think the Prosecutor would agree with you. That's not what the pharmacist argued, but it seems clear to me. I have little sympathy for armed robbers who get what's coming to them, but I think the jury was probably correct on this one.Robber was shot once in the head, then the guy defending the store left the store to go after the second robber. 45 seconds later the defender comes back into the store, then grabs another gun and then shoots the guy laying on the floor already shot once in the head another five times???
That was an execution IMO.
If the defended would of just loaded 5 more rounds into the guy on the floor after he was shot in the head, he would of had a better chance of arguing self defense IMO, and even then it could be iffy iffy.