dmccarty
Super Star Member
Stuff about the Somme and such makes me angry that the population at large are such suckers. Send the Politicians kids first to be used as canon fodder and then we'll see where we go from there.
During WWI, the upper class did go off to fight and died at a higher rate than the lower classes. Lower ranking officers, platoon and company leaders, usually suffer much higher casualty rates and these men are usually college educated, especially at the start of a war. This was certainly true during the early years of WWI and to be college educated meant one was from the upper class in the UK.
Viewpoint: 1 big myths about World War One debunked - BBC News
...
Although the great majority of casualties in WW1 were from the working class, the social and political elite were hit disproportionately hard by WW1. Their sons provided the junior officers whose job it was to lead the way over the top and expose themselves to the greatest danger as an example to their men.
Some 12% of the British army's ordinary soldiers were killed during the war, compared with 17% of its officers. Eton alone lost more than 1,000 former pupils - 20% of those who served. UK wartime Prime Minister Herbert Asquith lost a son, while future Prime Minister Andrew Bonar Law lost two. Anthony Eden lost two brothers, another brother of his was terribly wounded, and an uncle was captured.
One of the horror multipliers was the Pal Battalions, which were units formed of men from the same locality. The idea was that a man would join up with his friends and serve with those friends. This helped recruitment greatly but when these units suffered heavy losses at the Somme and other battles, the impact on a town, city or region was huge. A large number of men getting wounded and killed in one battle was an enormous blow to an area.
Later,
Dan