SX3100, anyone?

[Perplexed]

The Mahindra dealership, which also sells NH and CCY, pointed me to the CCY SX3100 as being positioned between the Mahindra 2516 and 2816 in terms of size and weight, while being more powerful than the Mahindras. It's more like the 2516 where features are concerned (such as a 2-range HST), and it's about $1100 more than the 2516 and $700 more than the 2816.

I've not had any experience with CCY other than not-so-fond memories of kicking the cr@p out of a junky CC riding mower I had to deal with as a kid. That thing spent more time parted out across the garage floor than it did on the lawn, so that experience has me wondering how the SX3100 really is. I know it's a new product, but I was wondering if anyone here has one and if so, how they like it? Any issues? Any regrets buying it?

 

[MFRED]

The Cub-Yanmar's are not the MTD made, low end, lawn mowers you can get at you local big box store.

Yanmar has been around a long time and knows how to make equipment. It seems as though, around here, Cub tried to pick a level of dealership that could handle compact tractors, not everyone selling lawn tractors got the Yanmar stuff.

The tractors have been holding up very well. I think they offer an excellent value for your dollar. With the new 5-year warranty offered, and the 0% for 60mo going on, free first service, they seem like a real deal.

If your local dealer seems to have their crap together, most cub dealers do, it will make you a fine tractor.

 

[pdp11]

The SX3100 is essentially a John Deere 2720. Yanmar has built the CUTs for John Deere for many years. Although this tractor has only recently emerged as a Cub tractor, it's predecessors in the John Deere line go back many years.

 

[rt1tractor]

the cub sx 3100 is a nice tractor , dont be afraid of its 2 range transmission as its power makes up for a mid range , the main problem with a two range unit is its gear ratio's tend to be higher to compensate for the lack of power resulting in a slow moving tractor, sometimes painfully slow in reverse which results in the constant shifting of ranges .
this is not the case here ,this is a very peppy tractor package with forward/reverse speeds and backed by a five year warranty and 100 years of yanmar experiance !

 

[Perplexed]

Thanks for the input, folks. Since the dealer offered a nice deal on a 2010 model, I decided to go with the SX3100 with 54" FEL and 72" Woods PRD7200 finish mower. It was delivered the other day, and already I've used it to mow the yard, move some dirt, and relocate a brush pile. I'm still getting used to operating the FEL, but already I'm really liking the tractor! You're right, the 2-range transmission isn't an issue due to the 30 horses and the relative light weight of the tractor. I haven't noticed the lack of a 3rd range, especially since my property is pretty much flat with very little in the way of slopes. I have however noticed that the FEL unloads the rear tires considerably, so even a slight incline while mowing slowly around objects with the heavy Woods causes the rear R4 tires to break loose, necessitating the use of 4x4. I'll be parking the FEL to shift weight to the rear, since this time of year most of my tractor work will be with the mower. I don't want to add any weight to the tractor (i.e., filled tires or wheel weights) because I'd like to minimize turf damage, so removing the FEL seems to be the best way to go. The quick-detach design ought to make the process pretty painless.

I'm really pleased with my selection :thumbsup:

 

[Gods Country]

What is with all the dealers that have no problem selling FEL's without any balllast? NONE of the local dealers in my area will do that. It's worked into the price. Granted I live in a very hilly area, but the advantage of having ballast just for lifting heavy loads alone makes it worth while, let alone the safety aspects.

 

[rt1tractor]

Thanks for the input, folks. Since the dealer offered a nice deal on a 2010 model, I decided to go with the SX3100 with 54" FEL and 72" Woods PRD7200 finish mower. It was delivered the other day, and already I've used it to mow the yard, move some dirt, and relocate a brush pile. I'm still getting used to operating the FEL, but already I'm really liking the tractor! You're right, the 2-range transmission isn't an issue due to the 30 horses and the relative light weight of the tractor. I haven't noticed the lack of a 3rd range, especially since my property is pretty much flat with very little in the way of slopes. I have however noticed that the FEL unloads the rear tires considerably, so even a slight incline while mowing slowly around objects with the heavy Woods causes the rear R4 tires to break loose, necessitating the use of 4x4. I'll be parking the FEL to shift weight to the rear, since this time of year most of my tractor work will be with the mower. I don't want to add any weight to the tractor (i.e., filled tires or wheel weights) because I'd like to minimize turf damage, so removing the FEL seems to be the best way to go. The quick-detach design ought to make the process pretty painless.

I'm really pleased with my selection :thumbsup:

your cub dealer should be able to sell you a 3 point hitch weight box that is easy to remove ,just three clips, and will take care of your wheel slip , the best part is if you fill the bottom with weight then the remaining area will work as an excellent tool carrier for chains , saws , pins etc .
The weight boxes are pretty reasonable in price ,and you have the option of instant removal for minimum weight impact:thumbsup:

 

[Perplexed]

your cub dealer should be able to sell you a 3 point hitch weight box that is easy to remove ,just three clips, and will take care of your wheel slip , the best part is if you fill the bottom with weight then the remaining area will work as an excellent tool carrier for chains , saws , pins etc .
The weight boxes are pretty reasonable in price ,and you have the option of instant removal for minimum weight impact:thumbsup:

The weight box would require the removal of the finish mower though, right? I'm experiencing tire slip while mowing with the finish mower on the ground and the FEL positioned a foot or two up. That's why I figured on detaching the FEL so the weight is shifted back over the rear tires.

 

[Perplexed]

What is with all the dealers that have no problem selling FEL's without any balllast? NONE of the local dealers in my area will do that. It's worked into the price. Granted I live in a very hilly area, but the advantage of having ballast just for lifting heavy loads alone makes it worth while, let alone the safety aspects.

I asked several local dealers about that. The response? "Most people will have a box blade or brush hog or other rear implement in place, so ballast isn't needed." Not really the answer you (or I) would be looking for, but there you have it

 

[rt1tractor]

The weight box would require the removal of the finish mower though, right? I'm experiencing tire slip while mowing with the finish mower on the ground and the FEL positioned a foot or two up. That's why I figured on detaching the FEL so the weight is shifted back over the rear tires.

sorry, i assumed you had a mid mount mower , my fault , loading your tires would be your option , you do not need to completely fill the rear tires , just fill 1/4 to 1/2 , that should help with any slippage while keeping the weight down . Unless you have a soft lawn ,you probably are not going to see any impact with totally filled tires . just my thoughts

 

[pdp11]

I have a John Deere 2520 (nearly the same as the SX3100) and I have the rear tires filled with liquid. I'm not sure what kind of soil or turf you are mowing, but you will likely find that it's the front tires that do the most damage.

The loaded rear tires add a great deal of stability to the tractor, especially with the FEL. I have no problem with the rear tires causing damage to the turf. Of course, if it's too wet, they will leave R4 prints in the softer areas.

If you intend to use the FEL frequently, I would consider filling the rear tires and adding a ballast box to the rear.

 

[gordyy]

another consideration is foam filling not as heavy as rimguard but if you use in areas of tire abuse its an option
my sc2400 the tires from the factory are only 2 ply rated at 55o lbs go figure the sb54 is heavy the loader is 400lbs can lift about 750 or thereabouts is what you can get in for dirt add that up tires failed at 500hrs
got new ones and as many flats and as much curb abuse (snow removal accts I have to climb curbs at times daily) I filled the new tires with foam, adds about 50lbs to front tires takes most of the suspension or bounce out (a really not nice thing) but they never go flat again
the rimguard in the rear was the bomb as far as I am concerned added a lot of weight still has the same bounce

 

[newt92]

Looked at a SX3100 today. How does it compare on $$ vs. a JD 2720? Tractor for tractor the are almost the same machine. The loaders are quite a bit different. Looks like the Deere loader is easier to take off and the bucket too.

Really would like to know the price difference between the two.

 

[Perplexed]

Looked at a SX3100 today. How does it compare on $$ vs. a JD 2720? Tractor for tractor the are almost the same machine. The loaders are quite a bit different. Looks like the Deere loader is easier to take off and the bucket too.

Really would like to know the price difference between the two.

My SX3100 is a 2010 model, and I paid cash, so I got a reduced price for those two conditions. IIRC, the dealer told me a 2011, paid for in cash, would be about $19,000. I think there's still an ongoing deal where you can get either 0% financing or a free FEL, if you haven't heard of that already.

No knocks on JD, but during my research leading up to a tractor purchase, I got the distinct impression you paid a premium for the JD name (as well as for Kubota and New Holland). In fact, my dealer, who also sells NH and Mahindra, told me that currently their best seller is the CCY 2450, by a considerable margin. The SX3100 is quite popular in the NE. Anyway, I opted to get more tractor for the price from a lesser-known manufacturer, but that's not without its risks.

 

[scoutcub]

I've got an SX3100 with loader and mmm for sale......2.2 hours, full warranty started 12/15/2011 transfers. I've got pics if interested. Perfect tractor! Also can sell a 72" KK brush hog or a bush hog flail mower with it.
PM me for details.