jstrick
Member
The stance that JD is taking on the "right to repair" debate is one of the main reasons I ended up buying a Kubota. The Kubota stance seems to be more in line with helping their customers as opposed to just sucking money out of them. I have a really simple tractor (a 1950 Farmall H) that my granddad bought to replace his team of mules. It is "easy to fix", is it something "I can work on" etc. etc. but that seems to be about all I can get done sometimes. Not to mention that I feel like I am risking my life most times I use it.
The other reason I bought Kubota is that my father in law owns 9 or 10 of them (maybe more?), most of which don't run any more. But the amount of abuse and neglect it took to make them not run was truly impressive! My intention is to not abuse and/or neglect my new tractor and hopefully my grand kids will replace it in 70 years saying "it is just too primitive and unsafe" or some such. My other comment on my new Kubota is that I really LIKE the low emission engine system. I get so tired of breathing diesel fumes on my in-law's tractors and my bigger Orange tractor doesn't make that kind of stink.
The other reason I bought Kubota is that my father in law owns 9 or 10 of them (maybe more?), most of which don't run any more. But the amount of abuse and neglect it took to make them not run was truly impressive! My intention is to not abuse and/or neglect my new tractor and hopefully my grand kids will replace it in 70 years saying "it is just too primitive and unsafe" or some such. My other comment on my new Kubota is that I really LIKE the low emission engine system. I get so tired of breathing diesel fumes on my in-law's tractors and my bigger Orange tractor doesn't make that kind of stink.