paulsharvey
Super Member
Very nearly started a Rural politics development-infrastructure thread, but thought better of it. Had a County Commission candidate stop by today, and got to talking with him about some of this. Probably better to not
It only has to make sense for you and if values drop some it shouldn’t be a concern unless you need to sell.So, got an update. The last property we toured, they contacted our agent and asked if we were still interested. 6.7% drop off asking price, and they will pay for the survey.
Wife really likes this one, I like it well enough, and logically, it checks our boxes. I know some people get excited by the process of buying a house/property. I wouldn't call myself excited, more just ready to get it done.
I know there is a lot of mixed talk about a real estate crash, or maybe not, with high inflation. I dont really know which direction it's going, and it could be a good one bad move, but you can't just sit on the fence forever.
It's going to be uncomfortable, till we sell our current home, but after that, it will be less scary.
I've bought real estate and paid high, paid low, bought in rising markets and falling ones.I know there is a lot of mixed talk about a real estate crash, or maybe not, with high inflation.
Is this the property which you decided on?So, I drew a picture, cause I'm not good with words. Parent parcel was divided into A, B, C, D, and E. All parcels, plus the large forestry track behind have access across Parcel-D. Parcel-A has the home, and Parcel-B was included in original sale ad. Parcel-C is owned by an absentee owner in Philly. Parcel D and E are owned by same person, who lives on E, and runs a small grape and cattle operation.
So if I could get A+B, there would still be two easments, one going to the large forestry tract, and one to the small cattle operation. The cattle operation has better access across is own Parcel, but easement remains, so, it's unused, but legally still there. Parcel B has access across A, as well as the large forestry track. The ones along the property lines aren't ideal; but frankly, not a huge concern. The one right down the Center of Parcel A, going to B, however would be a major concern.
I think I messed sketch up, forestry track only has access along the eastern propety line. Only B has the one right down center of A.View attachment 879213
No. We are under contact on the narrow piece with a small lake/pond at the southern end.Is this the property which you decided on?
So, the only way I understand the over asking price stuff is if you want something that isn't included. Had a coworker/friend, in a more desirable area, when he sold his house, they buyer offered like $20k over (it was like $799k or so), but they wanted him to leave the outdoor furniture, a dinning room table, and of all things, some potted plants.Up here in Canada ( Ontario) it is becoming common practice for real estate agents to list the houses lower than expected , to develop a bidding war that brings sell price many many thousands over the listed price.....and they hold the opening of bids and do all at once sometimes.......I find the practices sleazy and makes it very difficult to shop for house, when you have to guess how much over the bids might go. Sort of like shopping for a car but you have to ignore the window sticker price.....it's just not right. Price the house at proffesional assessed value and open offers when they are given. Counter bid and come to a ultimate agreement on price and inclusions. Seems it was fair for 100 years why not now.
This oneIs this the property which you decided on?
What is it, about 14 acres? This looks a bit more desirable than the tract I mentioned above, and a lot fewer issues. Is the abutting water body of pretty good size?
It's like 12.5 acres to 13.5, depending on if you count the road on the west, that this property owns to the centerline, as well as the submerged lands. The water body is small, about 5.5 acres total, bur kinda split, looks like a peanut, with a longer, narrower southern section of 3 acres and a northern, roundish 2.5 acres with a narrow section connecting the two, which has been on/off dry during major droughts over last 10-15 years, but appear to be underwater 85% of the time.Wh
What is it, about 14 acres? This looks a bit more desirable than the tract I mentioned above, and a lot fewer issues. Is the abutting water body of pretty good size?
No access across this property. The water, I would have to do digging on FLa rules about either pumping or animals watering directly from an open water source. Other than that, yes, free use.Do neighbors have any rights to access the property?
Can you utilize the lake in anyway... water source, canoe, etc.?
Looks like it could be very scenic... but many abutting properties.