Thanks for the specs input PaulB and Hayden,
The 2.9gpm hydraulic pump figure for
B1700,
B2100 came from the tractortips website and as I said I have a LOT of doubts about the figures there. I *suspect* that there are dual 2.9gpm pumps which would match the 5.8gpm given for the
B2400, make sense.
All
B1700 and B2100s have PS & position control ! Wow that's great. That really expands the used tractors I can consider. I've taken the comments about the desirability of power steering to heart too.
After correcting some typos and finding some old data sheet info on various dealer websites and adding in comments and my guesses based on PaulB and Haydens notes I have ...
B/BX series Hydromatic Drive Tractor Specs (tentative)
Model - Gross/PTO horsepower, Steering/Position, Weight,
Lift/Lift@24", Pump Capacity. Tach
BX1800 - 18/13.7hp, PS/DC, 1255lb, 1210/680lb, 5.5gpm, NoTach
BX2200 - 22/16.7hp, PS/DC, 1300lb, 1210/680lb, 5.5gpm, NoTach
B7400 - 16/12.5hp, MS/DC, 1290lb, 1356/1058lb, 3.9gpm, Tach
B7500 - 24/16hp, PS/DC, 1367lb, 1356/1058lb, 7.0gpm, Tach
B2410 - 24/18hp, PS/PC, 1477lb, 1655/1300lb. 7.0gpm, Tach
B2710 - 27/20hp, PS/PC, 1741lb, 1655/1300lb. 9.5gpm, Tach
B2910 - 30/22hp, PS/PC, 1763lb, 1655/1300lb. 9.5gpm, Tach
B1700 - 17/13hp, PS/PC, 1402lb, 1280/1015lb, 5.8gpm, Tach
B2100 - 21/16hp, PS/PC, 1428lb, 1280/1015lb, 5.8gpm, Tach
B2400 - 24/18hp, PS/PC, 1461lb, 1280/1015lb, 5.8gpm, Tach
B7100 - 16/13hp, MS/DC, 1265lb, 1036/#lb, 3.6gpm, ?
B7300 - 16/12.5hp, MS/DC, 1312lb, 1100/860lb, 3.9gpm, ?
--
PS - power_steering
MS - manual_steering
PC _ position_control
DC - directional_control
==
So the
B1700/2100/2400 and
B2410 are starting to look very attractive to me, with the
BX2200 and BX7500 still in the running.
My question on performance and horsepower. I see on Steve Carver's 'tips' page at
http://www.carverequipment.com/tips.htm
that he is strongly in favor of the compacts 'B's over the subcompact 'BX's, making statements like the
B7300 @16hp is 50% more tractor and 20% "more efficient" at mowing than the 22hp
BX2200.
I'm not fool enough to rate any machine by horsepower alone. Better design for a given application can make up for a lot of raw hp. At a certain point you are just spinning your wheels harder with those extra HP. So is Carver's statements justified ?
All the units I'm considering fall between 1300lb and 1477 lbs so weight isn't an issue. The wheelbases and heights, especially on the BX vary quite a bit. Could I really finish mow any faster or better with a B7300s 12.5pto-hp or a B7500s 16pto-hp vs a
BX2200 w/ 16.7pto-hp ? Seems unlikely to me. This is a very important question, since ultimately I'll be putting in more hours mowing after the first couple years of landscaping and garden prep than anything else. What am I missing ?
I could believe that there are design factors that make a
B7500 or
B2100 better suited to 'tractor' application than a
BX2200. FEL lift capacity on a BX is 480lbs vs 685 to 760lbs for the various B7x00/B2x10 line FELS. I would think that height might make post hole digging difficult on the short
BX2200 even tho the extra pto-hp would be a big advantage.
Are there any big differnces in the transmissions on these units ?
I guess I feel that the BX was built to mow with light duty tractoring built on, but units like the
B2400 are tractors with mowing capability as part of the design. I mean if I intended to use a FEL every day a never mow, the BXs wouldn't be in consideration despite comparable specs. I *think* my application with some post-hole digging, landscaping and moving downed timber is on the edge for a
BX2200 despite the superior horsepower. Is the
B2100 a step up from the
BX2200 in these 'tractor' appications ?
I occasionally see some Kubota B-series numbers I don't recognize, like the
B2150 which tractortips claims is 24/18hp made from 1988-1998, or the
B1550/
B1750. Can anyone explain what these are ? They seem to be heavier and have higher HP engines than their names would suggest.