prof fate
Platinum Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
- Messages
- 684
- Location
- beaver pa
- Tractor
- kioti ck3510 Cub Cadet 149, 2146, Toro Zero Turn
maybe for floatation on wet ground,but I doubt 1" will do anything for rollover.
Farmers ahve been tilling hillsides here, across not up/down, for decades with old skinny tired tractors.
Width, or lack of, has benefits - a brush hog or box blade can be smaler (aka cheaper to buy) and be wider than the track of the tractor for one.
MOving to a bigger tractor I have concerns of where I"ll fit or not- I know I'm gonna have issues with a 6' brush hog, i've had issues with ROPS height..
PSI- weight per square inch. Those jacked up pickup with big mudder tires won't move in snow. The old WW2 army jeeps had skinny tires - to get thruough the mud- sink to where it's solid and there is traction.
If you have a soft, wet area then maybe wider is better - less pressure per square inch lets you float over. In snow and rain on roads it's the exact opposite.
My old tractor had skinny turfs on it (and no 4x4 or even locking diff). New tractor is twice the weight and has those features, plus filled R4 tires. I'm curious as to how it will do on wet ground and snow.
talked with a fellow yesterday that has an L48 kubota with R4's and a B32 with turfs - he says the L48, even with backhoe, won't go for crap in the snow - much larger, heavier machine. He's changing it to turfs next year when these tires are done, if not sooner (new tires are not cheap).
My research indicates turfs are better in the snow than R4, but R4 is better in mud and more puncture resistant. Here's hoping I chose well for my conditions!
Farmers ahve been tilling hillsides here, across not up/down, for decades with old skinny tired tractors.
Width, or lack of, has benefits - a brush hog or box blade can be smaler (aka cheaper to buy) and be wider than the track of the tractor for one.
MOving to a bigger tractor I have concerns of where I"ll fit or not- I know I'm gonna have issues with a 6' brush hog, i've had issues with ROPS height..
TooRoo, do you think you can get it from dealer with 17.5 tires? One of my concerns is it's width is about 6" less than other rigs. Doesn't seem like mutch but I have uneven ground. And my wife will tell ya, an 1" is everything!
PSI- weight per square inch. Those jacked up pickup with big mudder tires won't move in snow. The old WW2 army jeeps had skinny tires - to get thruough the mud- sink to where it's solid and there is traction.
If you have a soft, wet area then maybe wider is better - less pressure per square inch lets you float over. In snow and rain on roads it's the exact opposite.
My old tractor had skinny turfs on it (and no 4x4 or even locking diff). New tractor is twice the weight and has those features, plus filled R4 tires. I'm curious as to how it will do on wet ground and snow.
talked with a fellow yesterday that has an L48 kubota with R4's and a B32 with turfs - he says the L48, even with backhoe, won't go for crap in the snow - much larger, heavier machine. He's changing it to turfs next year when these tires are done, if not sooner (new tires are not cheap).
My research indicates turfs are better in the snow than R4, but R4 is better in mud and more puncture resistant. Here's hoping I chose well for my conditions!
Forgive me, but can you provide more information on that? I do not understand how a 2.6" increase in tire (traction) width is worse for the weight. You cited better ground pressure, but soil condition would have a direct impact on whether that is a good or bad.
Soft and wet ground would work against a more centralized contact pad.
On dryer ground would a larger pad be a bad thing?
This is my first tractor with industrial tires and the only other real experience I have with a similar although much larger tire is with off road fork lifts. Furthermore, my only real tractor experience has been with Ag tires.