arrow
Super Member
Not awareWeren't they bought out by Paladin?
I know originally they were in Tennessee
Not awareWeren't they bought out by Paladin?
This practice of price jacking on existing inventory has always rubbed me the wrong way.Never miss a opportunity to increase prices.
A gas station I know was great at this… he would see his competitor raise prices and he would do the same…
Owner said price is based on the market and not cost…
At the parts store back in the 80’s every time we got a price increase it was my job to mark up the existing inventory.
Just in time inventory was taught to the country of Japan by American businessmen during WWII reconstruction and rebuilding, even though the system had not been implemented in the U.S.A. yet. The main drawback is time; just one delivery truck running a day late or involved in a crash shuts down finished product production.One of Walmart's key to success was perfecting "Just In Time Inventory".
I have no demonstrable data I can share but I can tell you as per notification from Mahindra the $24995 tractor will be closer to $27000 shortly
Oh yeah, for sure. Space Requirements, Taxes, Lost Opportunity, Market Uncertainty, Employee Theft. The list goes on.Carrying inventory does have costs associated with it, so I can understand the need for a "just in time" model, when operating in a competitive market.
Just in time worked well for medical pre pandemic but continues to plague the industry ever since…I run my business based on holding no inventory other than the current projects I'm building, and things with mininum buys greater than project demand (i.e. screws, electrical conctacts... cheap stuff). It's not truly "just-in-time", as I will bring in some parts (e.g. connectors) weeks ahead of the custom-fab'd parts becoming ready to assemble a project, just so that I don't have to worry about a distributor running out of stock and holding me up when I need the part. But most anything that's an always-available commodity is ordered for delivery just ahead of the custom fab parts, to keep my inventory as low as possible.
Carrying inventory does have costs associated with it, so I can understand the need for a "just in time" model, when operating in a competitive market. Moreover, you're usually stuck paying for that inventory within 30 days of your vendor shipping it, and it's nice to not have such a long gap between the money you spent and money coming back from your current project, when you're trying to already make funding available for the next project!
My big gripe right now is that many customers are seeking 60 day credit terms, breaking the century-old (centuries-old?) tradition of "Net 30" terms. So far, those customers have always needed me more than I need them, so I reject any order coming with a request for 60 day terms. It hasn't cost me any business yet, each customer has come back and agreed to Net 30, but I suspect that's only a matter of time until Net 60 becomes accepted by enough of my competitors as to be a real issue for me.
If you can't manage pay your bills within 30 days, I'm not sure I really want to do business with you!But some of those pushing this are the largest companies, where stretching credit terms at 1.5%/month can translate to a lot of money.
I heard an economist once argue that capitalism is the best system on earth, for nearly everything except disaster relief management. Tuning your supply chain efficiency for minimum stock is the last thing you want when Hurricane Katrina or a health pandemic hits the public.Just in time worked well for medical pre pandemic but continues to plague the industry ever since…
True… but then there is the question of outdates and minimum purchase…I heard an economist once argue that capitalism is the best system on earth, for nearly everything except disaster relief management. Tuning your supply chain efficiency for minimum stock is the last thing you want when Hurricane Katrina or a health pandemic hits the public.![]()