New LS MT342 loader issues

/ New LS MT342 loader issues #21  
I looked at my loader line's this weekend and I have to correct myself. The quick connects at the loader are 3/8" (6600 series) and and then it is 1/4" hose and tubing from there. So the restrictions will be the loader hoses and lines.

A pump that will put out approximately 7-7.5 GPM, quick connects rated at 6 GPM and 1/4" hoses rated, highly marginal, at 3-4 GPM.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues
  • Thread Starter
#22  
I looked at my loader line's this weekend and I have to correct myself. The quick connects at the loader are 3/8" (6600 series) and and then it is 1/4" hose and tubing from there. So the restrictions will be the loader hoses and lines.

A pump that will put out approximately 7-7.5 GPM, quick connects rated at 6 GPM and 1/4" hoses rated, highly marginal, at 3-4 GPM.

I wonder why they went with 1/4? Has anyone looked at a New Holland tractor of the same size? They are LS tractors but New Holland has their own loader. I will have to see if I can locate one and see what size lines they use?
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #23  
I wonder why they went with 1/4? Has anyone looked at a New Holland tractor of the same size? They are LS tractors but New Holland has their own loader. I will have to see if I can locate one and see what size lines they use?
I can tell you, because my old one was a New Holland and that loader used 1/2" hose and 1/2" OD tubing. It used the same 3/8" quick connects (6600 series).
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues
  • Thread Starter
#24  
Would larger hose speed up loader? Reduce lift capacity?
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #25  
It would speed it up but shouldn't impact lift capabilities.

If the 1/4" lines are causing a pressure drop due to restrictions then you could see some gain in capabilities by using the larger lines. Don't suspect it would be that large of a change.

New Holland also used smaller diameter cylinders than LS. That would also impact cycle times as well.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #26  
I wonder why they went with 1/4?...

I believe I read in another thread that doing this should help reduce the severity of the floppy bucket syndrome some complained about.
 
/ New LS MT342 loader issues #27  
I believe I read in another thread that doing this should help reduce the severity of the floppy bucket syndrome some complained about.
Yep. Couple different ways they could have addressed that issue. They chose smaller lines restricting the flow. But there are trade-offs with different methods
 

Marketplace Items

2005 Chevrolet C4500 Altec Bucket Truck (A56858)
2005 Chevrolet...
2011 DOOSAN G25KW GENERATOR (A60736)
2011 DOOSAN G25KW...
INGERSOLL RAND  G25 GENERATOR (A60736)
INGERSOLL RAND...
2018 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA 125 6X4 T/A SLEEPER TRUCK TRACTOR (A59908)
2018 FREIGHTLINER...
1999 TRANSCRAFT FLAT BED 48FT TRAILER (A59905)
1999 TRANSCRAFT...
2005 DRAGON ROLL-OFF  TRAILER (A60736)
2005 DRAGON...
 
Top