2manyrocks
Super Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2007
- Messages
- 7,359
Yes, we need to be careful with the math. Politicians can get away with being biased and sloppy, but we need to be are smarter than that.
An investment can cost money, but it is not the same as an expense.
CPI is only for "non-investment" expenses. It is simply to be a way to measure the change in non-recoverable spending. i.e. the basic costs of living. Renters don't get to recover any of their rent, so for them their rent is purely a cost - and that is why rental increases are part of the CPI.
When you get into home ownership - or any investment where you have costs versus appreciation - we change over to discussing investments - which is a whole different animal. Although a mortgage eats up a lot of income while it is being paid off, property tends to go up. Home ownership ultimately makes money for the owners. At worst it breaks even. So unlike rent, mortgages pay back. That is why they are not included in CPI calculations. Investing is always optional.
rScotty
That follows the official rationale; however, their method of sampling only .1 percent of rentals in the USA to determine rental rates for 48 million rental units in the USA seems like a poor sampling likely to not accurately reflect true rental rates. They then try to extrapolate "owners equivalent rent" from this "data" which strikes me as also unlikely to reflect the reality of home ownership costs.