M59 Discussion Thread

/ M59 Discussion Thread #42  
love to see pics of the grapple

I'll try to post some tomorrow. It is the anbo brand, but sold by skidsteer solutions. 74 inches wide. which is what I measured my back tire width. Sides are 3/4 inch and tines are 5/8 inch wide. At 1265 pound it's a monster. It still leaves approx 2700 Lbs of lift which is the same or more than some of the larger tractors 65 and 90 horse power. I used it today some, and pick up a huge red oak. My 3830 would not budge the one half that size. Very impressed so far. Will also try to post in the attachment forum later.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #43  
Well, there's another new M59 in the group. After much arm-twisting my wife finally prevailed on me to get a new modern tractor. I agreed - but only if she would help me pick it out. So after comparing tractors for a month of weekends the M59 got the nod. It's sitting in front of the house tonight - brand new, capable of anything, and very, very orange.

Haven't used it yet, but sure do like the way that engine sounds. Nice heavy construction and a comfortable operator's platform rated high too.
rScotty
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#44  
congratulations!

You'll love it. Just got a dump truck of 3/4 gravel - 24 tons. I've spread almost all of it from 7pm to 9pm under its lights (I did add 3 to the built ins). Amazing how fast work can get done.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #46  
congratulations!.... Amazing how fast work can get done.

IYou bet! At first I was concerned about that giant Kubota bucket being too large. That almost caused me to order a 4n1 instead of the Kubota bucket. Now I'm glad for that 84" Kubota bucket and the reinforced edge. The M59 handles the weight and size of the bucket easily and the quantity of work that a big bucket will do is awesome. It's particularly handy for back-dragging our dirt roads.

Still want to order a 4n1 or else add some sort of "pick-em-up" to the Kubota bucket...Haven't decided exactly which way to go...or what brand. One idea revolves around how handy it would be to add something hydraulic to the existing bucket so that it can grab things like rocks or logs. Hmm....what's the bucket weigh as is? Anyone know?
rScotty
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#47  
bucket weight is around 800 as is. They have bolt on grapples, but honestly, you'd be better of with a QA one, you've got a built in QA. Check out Markham.

I do love my 4n1, but its not a grapple - they do different things, I wouldn't say picking up is its strong point. But it does clamp in a different way then the grapple does, I find both useful.

I actually came on to put out some info on the backhoe quick coupler. I've found the lynch pin that holds the quick couple pin on comes off very easily. I just got a replacement, (both pins) and in a few hours of digging lost the lynch pin again despite wiring it on. With 2 separate wires no less. Granted this is digging stumps, so its easy for things to catch.

But no more lynch pin for me on the backhoe bucket. I'm going out to buy a grade 5 bolt and will put it on with my portable impact driver. Honestly, that's probably going to be as fast to change as the regular lynch pin was - despite coming off easily while working, it was a pain for me to remove. And I don't change backhoe buckets that often.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#48  
Hydraulics question.

On my b3030, I seem to achieve maximum hydraulic pressure at around 2/3 max RPM. On the m59 hydraulic pressure seems to climb all the way up to max RPM, so I end up running it around 2500 while using the hoe or Preseeder.

Is that everyone else's experience?
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #49  
You have to get a thick stack of 1 3/4 washers to tighten up the lynch pins or you are going to do like I did, and buy lot's and lot's of lynch pins.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#50  
yeah, I remember your advice larry, but I think the nut and bolt will be even easier.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #51  
the nut and bolt works great until you peen over the threads on the bolt, then it becomes time to cut the thing off. Been here and done that, and more than once. I found the washers stack works best..
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#52  
Hmm, that's a good point. I'll see how this goes - grinding it off wouldn't be the end of the world. I did end up getting stainless and I'll put never seize on it, though with stainless so soft I'm not sure if that will make it better or worse.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #53  
Yes, that quick change lynch pin is a Kubota oversight. I like our new M59 - and the more I use it the better it gets. Its far and away the best of its type. But that's not going to make me ignore Kubota's design oversights or mistakes.....or stop me from fixing the ones that need it.

First change was to raise the seat a couple of inches and rubber mount it. Much nicer and gives a tad more knee room past the fender. Now the clearance problem is my big feet. But measuring it tonight there seems to be some space available by lowering the walk-through plate. It's worth a look.

For the lynch pin replacement I'm going to use a bolt with a nylock nut. Nylocks don't need to be tightened against a surface in order to resist turning. Give it a try. Best case would be to use a bolt long enough to leave about an eight of an inch end play after it fills up the Nylock nut threads.

Chain hooks on the bucket are next on the list, followed by remounting the thumb control lever, some sound deadening for the hood & hood protector, and a look at the range shifter. Then wheel weights. I'd love to have a vertical exhaust stack, but am hoping that Kubota will come up with one as an option.
It is really satisfying to find things to customize on such a well-built machine.
rScotty
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #54  
I have 12 and 24 inch buckets and for quite a while there, was changing them several times a day at my project at the time. After losing several lynch pins and bolting them,, fighting to get the bolts off, regardless of being bent and or threads peened over,, took way too much time..I started with the large washers,, after awhile, I have it down to a science with the washer stack and in the last 4 years have lost only one lynch pin. Our geology is heavy rock, and digging trenches and scraping along side of rock/boulders it is easy to lose a pin, from being worn through or most times simply lost,, This may not work for the rest of you and you may need to design something else, For me, the washer stack works and I like the KISS way to complete things,
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #55  
Hydraulics question.

On the m59 hydraulic pressure seems to climb all the way up to max RPM, so I end up running it around 2500 while using the hoe or Preseeder.

Is that everyone else's experience?

Our new M59 is still on break-in hours so I haven't run the motor up yet..... but that sounds pretty typical for a small open center type of hydraulic pump and system. I don't know if that is the system that the M59 uses because the factory and parts manuals are still on order. Does anyone have the books yet?

I'm guessing open center system because it is simple, inexpensive, efficient, and mostly adequate for low to medium pressure systems. Yes, I've noticed that my BH is slow at doing no-load cycles at idle RPMs and that sort of surprised me as it implies a low flow rate. But a higher flow rate would be a constant load on the system when driving around. Since I'm rarely in a hurry this system flow is likely more than I need. Of course for smooth low RPM flow the closed center type of system like John Deere uses is king. But it is expensive and complex. The advantage there is that the pressure is dependent on the load rather than on the RPM. And also that the closed center pump is not putting a constant horsepower load on the engine. Closed center damages your pocketbook, but only costs power when the hydraulics are being used. That is why the JD can get away with using such a high flow rate pump.

On previous tractors I've plumbed in a pressure gauge on a "tee" and watched the pressure change as the loader worked. It's interesting and also keeps me informed about the "health" of the hydraulic system. For our M59s I expect that the factory workshop manual will have a pressure/RPM spec that we can measure against.
rScotty
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#56  
Our new M59 is still on break-in hours so I haven't run the motor up yet..... but that sounds pretty typical for a small open center type of hydraulic pump and system. I don't know if that is the system that the M59 uses because the factory and parts manuals are still on order. Does anyone have the books yet?

I'm guessing open center system because it is simple, inexpensive, efficient, and mostly adequate for low to medium pressure systems. Yes, I've noticed that my BH is slow at doing no-load cycles at idle RPMs and that sort of surprised me as it implies a low flow rate. But a higher flow rate would be a constant load on the system when driving around. Since I'm rarely in a hurry this system flow is likely more than I need. Of course for smooth low RPM flow the closed center type of system like John Deere uses is king. But it is expensive and complex. The advantage there is that the pressure is dependent on the load rather than on the RPM. And also that the closed center pump is not putting a constant horsepower load on the engine. Closed center damages your pocketbook, but only costs power when the hydraulics are being used. That is why the JD can get away with using such a high flow rate pump.

On previous tractors I've plumbed in a pressure gauge on a "tee" and watched the pressure change as the loader worked. It's interesting and also keeps me informed about the "health" of the hydraulic system. For our M59s I expect that the factory workshop manual will have a pressure/RPM spec that we can measure against.
rScotty

Scotty, you clearly have a much better technical understanding of this than I do! I'd love to hear your results if you slap a gauge on though, or if you come across the info.

As I understand it, the kubota design should be more fuel efficient? In that you only use high flow when you need it? I have found it to be a surprisingly fuel efficient tractor, though nothing like the b3030, which does not actually seem to consume any diesel.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread
  • Thread Starter
#57  
Yes, that quick change lynch pin is a Kubota oversight. I like our new M59 - and the more I use it the better it gets. Its far and away the best of its type. But that's not going to make me ignore Kubota's design oversights or mistakes.....or stop me from fixing the ones that need it.

First change was to raise the seat a couple of inches and rubber mount it. Much nicer and gives a tad more knee room past the fender. Now the clearance problem is my big feet. But measuring it tonight there seems to be some space available by lowering the walk-through plate. It's worth a look.

For the lynch pin replacement I'm going to use a bolt with a nylock nut. Nylocks don't need to be tightened against a surface in order to resist turning. Give it a try. Best case would be to use a bolt long enough to leave about an eight of an inch end play after it fills up the Nylock nut threads.

Chain hooks on the bucket are next on the list, followed by remounting the thumb control lever, some sound deadening for the hood & hood protector, and a look at the range shifter. Then wheel weights. I'd love to have a vertical exhaust stack, but am hoping that Kubota will come up with one as an option.
It is really satisfying to find things to customize on such a well-built machine.
rScotty

Agreed. I think in this thread we are by nature going to focus on things that can be improved on the machine, but I should be clear that I think it's excellent, would buy it again, and would recommend the M59.

I did get a bolt and lock nut as you described. Got stainless and will put never seize on it. Also got 4 flat washers and a lock washer. Hopefully I won't have the peening larry describes. Though I also won't be changing buckets nearly as often!

Hooks on the bucket are key. I had messicks weld them on. 4 hooks on the 24, in a pattern rec'd on TBN. only 1 hook on the 12 - it needs two, as the direction always seems to be wrong.... I've already found a great deal of use for the hooks.

By remounting the thumb control lever, do you mean reversing it? Thats's on todays project list, actually. I'm going to reverse the hoses at the cylinder. Messicks put QCs on, as an aside, for running things off the thumb control in the future - I hope to put my hydraulic PHD out there.

I'd love a vertical stack! I saw someone on here rigged one up for a b3030, so hopefully someone will do it for the m59. Beyond my technical skills I fear.

What I do with the seat (I'm a big guy, 6'5, size 13 shoes) is tuck my feet up and spin. Its ok, better then the deere 110 by a long shot, but not ideal. I'd LOVE to see pics and info on how you altered your seat.

Its loud under the FOPS no doubt. I wear hearing protection.

Instead of wheel weights I foamed the tires. If you aren't transporting it, which I don't think you are, I'd really recommend some form of tire filling. Adds about a ton of weight, nice and low. I feel glued to the slopes, including some impressive ones.
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #58  
I did get a bolt and lock nut as you described. Got stainless and will put never seize on it.

I'd LOVE to see pics and info on how you altered your seat.

OK. In the hopes that they would be helpful I did take some pictures of the seat mount mod. It's pretty simple. THe 2x2 wood sections will probably get replaced with something nicer when I see if the height is right. The project was a bit rushed because my wife was impatient quit toying with the tractor so we could go out and DO SOMETHING WITH IT. - And so we did.... Laid some fieldstone steps up to the front porch using the backhoe and thumb. Back to the seat picture, the bolts should be 8-1.25 x 70 mm from the hardware store....Lowe's I think. The 3/4" rubber donuts are found between the cab and frame on most US pickups built in the last 50 years. The thin rubber washers are cut from any 1/8" rubber sheet - although I did see that Lowe's had those too.

Seat riser parts.JPG 2 inch seat riser.JPG

Seat%20riser%20parts.JPG
Some suppliers aren't familiar with the special nylock nuts. They are about twice the thickness of a normal nut and look like an acorn nut. Trapped in the additional space is a threaded piece of nylon that is slightly undersize for that thread and so locks it. It doesn't require a locking washer.
rScotty
 
/ M59 Discussion Thread #59  
"Hooks on the bucket are key.......4 hooks on the 24, in a pattern rec'd on TBN. ... I've already found a great deal of use for the hooks."

Oh, I didn't think of putting hooks on the BH bucket. Where? I use them on the front bucket a lot. That's where the first one's are going.

By re-mounting the thumb control I mean that I will move it up on the control column and work it with a lever. Kubota's ideas on foot controls seem to be made for someone else's feet. Plus their foot pedal just doesn't work very well. Is there enough flow through that thumb circuit to run a hydraulic PHD?

On flow: " As I understand it, the kubota design should be more fuel efficient? In that you only use high flow when you need it?"
No...sorry...because with open center you get more flow along with more RPM whether you need it or not....For example when you are driving down the road the tractor with an open center system is merrily pumping oil at full RPM and charging you energy for the useless work. The JD closed center pump first fills a reserve pressure tank and then sets the variable output hydraulic pump to idle until you call for it. If on the other hand you are stationary and using full hydraulic capacity the efficiencies are equal. When using less than full hydraulic flow capacity JD's closed center type is again more efficient. Credit where it is due... Because it doesn't have to run it all the time, the closed center system in a JD can afford to run a much larger hydraulic pump. It's simply a better system though much more expensive and elaborate. Tinkerers tend to prefer the Kubota open center type because it is easier to modify.
enjoy! rScotty
 
Last edited:
/ M59 Discussion Thread #60  
I'd love a vertical stack! I saw someone on here rigged one up for a b3030, so hopefully someone will do it for the m59. Beyond my technical skills I fear.

Maybe Messick's would build a vertical stack for us? I'd bet you could sell one to almost every M59 owner out there. It is hard to figure out why Kubota made such a nice machine and then aimed the exhaust so that the operator has to perpetually be driving through a cloud of diesel fumes. This exhaust problem could benefit from some immediate factory attention. Most of the other things we discuss are really just matters of individual preference, but the exhaust pipe needs to be fixed.
rScotty
 
Last edited:

Marketplace Items

2013 Ford Edge Limited AWD SUV (A59231)
2013 Ford Edge...
2020 Takeuchi TL8R2 Track Loader with 72in Tooth Bucket (A61306)
2020 Takeuchi...
2018 Ram 1500 4x4 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A59230)
2018 Ram 1500 4x4...
2018 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA TANDEM AXLE SLEEPER (A59905)
2018 FREIGHTLINER...
Unused 2025 20ft HD Trailer Solutions EQ14 7 Ton T/A Equipment Trailer (A59230)
Unused 2025 20ft...
2014 COTTRELL CAR HAULER TRAILER (A59904)
2014 COTTRELL CAR...
 
Top