Tires Loaded tires

/ Loaded tires
  • Thread Starter
#11  
That might make sense. Another thought: I see the point with a front loader needing the weight...especially going downhill. However, suppose you do not have your FEL on and an implement on the rear going uphill? Now you need front weight or a reduction in the tire weight? Removable weight would seem to be better.
 
/ Loaded tires #12  
Bill,Thanks for doing the math.800 pounds would be just right,same as my ballast.........Mike
 
/ Loaded tires #13  
<font color=red>"the constant weight on the frame would cause axle bearings and other suspension parts to wear faster than they would if the weight was not on the axles (i.e., in the wheel or tire)."</font color=red>

Mark,they have some good points.I've heard that too much front weight on 2wd tractors will often bend and break front axles because the wheels cannot climb out of trouble easily.
I don't know if this would apply to rear wheels but I did have a tractor with weighted rears and it had a tendency to throw the tractor(and me) around on uneven ground.
I guess they all have pros/cons...........Mike
 

Marketplace Items

UNUSED FUTURE FT-CL100C HYD CLAMP GRABBER (A52706)
UNUSED FUTURE...
2014 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA (A60736)
2014 FREIGHTLINER...
2017 Freightliner M2 106 AWD Terex Hi-Ranger 5TC55 55ft. Insulated Material Handling Bucket Truck (A60460)
2017 Freightliner...
INSPECTION (A61166)
INSPECTION (A61166)
2017 Bobcat T770 Compact Track Loader (A61307)
2017 Bobcat T770...
UNUSED FUTURE 12" HYD AUGER (A52706)
UNUSED FUTURE 12"...
 
Top