Tires Loaded tires

   / Loaded tires
  • Thread Starter
#11  
That might make sense. Another thought: I see the point with a front loader needing the weight...especially going downhill. However, suppose you do not have your FEL on and an implement on the rear going uphill? Now you need front weight or a reduction in the tire weight? Removable weight would seem to be better.
 
   / Loaded tires #12  
Bill,Thanks for doing the math.800 pounds would be just right,same as my ballast.........Mike
 
   / Loaded tires #13  
<font color=red>"the constant weight on the frame would cause axle bearings and other suspension parts to wear faster than they would if the weight was not on the axles (i.e., in the wheel or tire)."</font color=red>

Mark,they have some good points.I've heard that too much front weight on 2wd tractors will often bend and break front axles because the wheels cannot climb out of trouble easily.
I don't know if this would apply to rear wheels but I did have a tractor with weighted rears and it had a tendency to throw the tractor(and me) around on uneven ground.
I guess they all have pros/cons...........Mike
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

71056 (A49346)
71056 (A49346)
LOAD OUT AND SHIPPING (A51573)
LOAD OUT AND...
2014 UTILITY 53X102 DRY VAN TRAILER (A51222)
2014 UTILITY...
2007 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 4X4  DUALLY TRUCK (A51222)
2007 CHEVROLET...
2007 FREIGHTLINER BUSINESS CLASS M2 DUMP TRUCK (A51406)
2007 FREIGHTLINER...
2001 KENWORTH T800 TRI AXLE TANKER TRUCK (A51222)
2001 KENWORTH T800...
 
Top